<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sharing IP-SGT-Mappings between Switches with inline propagation in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3682204#M25297</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Jonathan,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you very much - this explains it!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 15:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmueller@cisco.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-06T15:20:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sharing IP-SGT-Mappings between Switches with inline propagation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3680689#M25295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a maybe basic question about SGACL-enforcement locally on access switches:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let’s assume I have two access-switches within a L2-deployment (Access-Switch A and Access-Switch B).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On Access-Switch A User_a is being authenticated, he get’s SGT 10. The switch downloads SGACL for SGT 10 from ISE, and the switch also has the SGT-to-ip mapping for User_a.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On Access-Switch B User_b is being authenticated, he get’s SGT 20. The switch downloads SGACL for SGT 20 from ISE, and the switch also has the SGT-to-ip mapping for User_b.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Propagation method is inline tagging.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now the SGACL denies communication between SGT 10 and SGT 20. If the packet now is sourced on access-switch A, how does access-switch A know about the SGT-to-ip mapping for User_b, which is stored locally on switch B?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 09:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3680689#M25295</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmueller@cisco.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-03T09:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sharing IP-SGT-Mappings between Switches with inline propagation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3680710#M25296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Roland,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;it doesn't know of the remote mapping.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember that the technology is built for egress enforcement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, traffic flows from A to B, the A side doesn't know of the B mapping so there can't be any enforcement on the A side for this flow. However, switch A inserts the source SGT into the L2 frame (inline propagation) for the packets sent to B. The B switch reads the source SGT off the wire, has the destination SGT and can enforce.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, egress enforcement on B.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the other direction it's the same - egress enforcement at A.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want/need to do ingress enforcement then you have to propagate the destination mappings back to the source (using something like SXP) but that doesn't scale.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers, Jonothan.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3680710#M25296</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeaves@cisco.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-03T10:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sharing IP-SGT-Mappings between Switches with inline propagation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3682204#M25297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Jonathan,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you very much - this explains it!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 15:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sharing-ip-sgt-mappings-between-switches-with-inline-propagation/m-p/3682204#M25297</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmueller@cisco.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-06T15:20:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

