<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982426#M286814</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&amp;amp;bugId=CSCtz39197&amp;amp;from=summary"&gt;http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&amp;amp;bugId=CSCtz39197&amp;amp;from=summary&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;take a look at this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eduardo Ferreira Fernandez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-28T01:42:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982401#M285975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just upgraded Cisco ISE to 1.1.1 in my lab/demo environment and am now having problems with a basic posture implementation. In short I connect to a wireless SSID and check posture based on the presence of a file. The NAC agent is declaring my host as compliant and granting full network access however about 5 seconds later it it checks for requirements again while placing my host in the temporary network access. At this point it states I am compliant again and 5 seconds later scans again. This behaivour does not stop and continues endlessly until I close the wireless connection. I had no problems with this setup on 1.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All logs indicate successful compliance and no errors in terms of compliance. ANy ideas would be appreciated. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982401#M285975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T02:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982402#M286066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stephen,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you check to see if the reassessment might be enabled:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html#wp1919629"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html#wp1919629&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982402#M286066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-19T03:05:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982403#M286151</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried with and without a PRA. Exact same issue. I have also tried the older NAC client, newer NAC client, different posture requirements all with the exact same looping result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982403#M286151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-19T03:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982404#M286240</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK as an update - this problem still exists for me. I have installed the previous 1.1 and run up the identical configuration in terms of authentication, authorisation, profiling, posturing and provisioning. The results are that my configuration works perfectly fine on 1.1 but with the same config on 1.1.1 posturing is severely broken. As described no matter what I do the NAC process completes deems the client compliant then proceeds to check compliance again. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:48:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982404#M286240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T03:48:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982405#M286309</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your best bet is to open a tac case to see what could be wrong with the policies and why the clients keep being re-postured. Also if you dont mind can you post the following debugs on the switch. "debug radius authentication" I am curious to see if there is a "session-timeout" attribute being set which is causing the switch to bounce the connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also please send the running configuratoin of your port too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982405#M286309</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T03:56:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982406#M286373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Heh, I probably should have mentioned that this is over wireless using EAP-TLS or PEAP. I also have CWA running for guests. Please also note that I have two ISE deployments side by side running the exact same policies - 1.1 works fine 1.1.1 does not. I am in contact with Cisco at present and am trying to arrange some assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982406#M286373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T04:57:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982407#M286411</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sounds good are you running them through the same controller using different SSIDs or are you using different controllers. Just out of curiosity can you send me the client information for a user that just passes posture? Also you are on the latest code for the wlc? Also have you had a chance to run a tcpdump from the ISE monitoring tool on both ise nodes in order to compare the radius traffic between them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:30:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982407#M286411</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T05:30:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982408#M286431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What output are you looking for with a user that passes - just the standard live auth output? Essentially all the&amp;nbsp; users pass posture and authentication but&amp;nbsp; instantly reinitiates posture discovery upon been granted full network access. I am on&amp;nbsp; the latest 7.2.110 code for my 5508. Furthermore my deployment is&amp;nbsp; standalone not distributed due to the demonstration nature of the&amp;nbsp; implementation. I am running a single SSID for EAP-TLS and PEAP using CoA to shift vlans and dACLs upon successful posture discovery/remediation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982408#M286431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T05:35:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982409#M286446</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to see the radius access-accept message that is sent from the running 1.1 vs the message that is sent from 1.1.1, in the access-accept packet i am interested to see if there is a change in the session-timeout attribute. I am also curious to see if there is a coa message being sent from the ise 1.1.1 immediatly after posture. There has to be some difference in the radius dialogue for this to occur and this will help point a finger as to where the bug lies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982409#M286446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T05:39:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982410#M286485</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry not entirely sure what exact dump to provide and where to retrievfe it from - as you know there are a tonne of logs associated with the process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982410#M286485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T05:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982411#M286540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure no problem, ISE has a built in tcpdump utility from the GUI once you get done reproducing the issue you can stop the capture (using raw ....format), then you can download and open in wireshark. Please post the results from both boxes after you reproduce the issue on both the working vs not working 1.1.1. Also you can enter the filter on the bottom as 'ip host x.x.x.x' where x.x.x.x is the ip address the wlc uses to source the radius requests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0.4/user_guide/ise10_mnt.html#wp1240485"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0.4/user_guide/ise10_mnt.html#wp1240485&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:58:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982411#M286540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T05:58:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982412#M286578</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The difference I can see is the Access-Accept after the CoA (Line 46 for Fail, line 20 for Success). The live authentication log confirms that host is compliant in both tests and the NAC client indicates it is refreshing the IP address on CoA. It is almost as if the 1.1.1 ISE does not match on the correct authorization after the CoA. When looking at these logs bear in mind that the configurations are identical&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 04:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982412#M286578</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T04:56:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982413#M286603</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stephen,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see that also and that is what I wanted to confirm in the packet capture. I wanted to know a few things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;on the 1.1.1 unit has it been updated to the perfigo servers? (I assume it has if you are able to deploy the agent and perform the checks but figured I would ask anyways)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;since the status is set to confirm can you compare the two posture reports (when you click on compliant it should take you to the posture report)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The authorization policy that you have configured for compliant machines, can you please remove it and then readd it and see if that fixes the issue?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the reference for the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Having the ise node perform the updates - &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_client_prov.html#wp1093078"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_client_prov.html#wp1093078&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here is where you can pull the posture report from both machines - &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html#wp1919498"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html#wp1919498&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982413#M286603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T05:18:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982414#M286626</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not sure what the perfigo servers are however it was able to download all of the resources required for this configuration. 1.1.1 is currently configured with the following:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://www.cisco.com/web/secure/pmbu/provisioning-update.xml"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/web/secure/pmbu/provisioning-update.xml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The two posture reports are identical and compliant. My basic check for file and AV installation was successful.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I have deleted the policy and readded it with no change whatsoever.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will also clarify that my deployments are standalone but this should not matter. ANother observation I can add is that on 1.1.1 when the posture process appears to be successful and the CoA is apparently occurring the NAC agent displays the text that the window will close in 30second or click this box to close. When I click the box the window will not close. I am using the same NAC client on both deployments with the same profile and compliance modules&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982414#M286626</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T05:35:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982415#M286655</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you remove the agent from this machine and have the 1.1.1 install the agent? Also is the compliant rule that you need to match configure properly? How did you set the condition for the redirection. Does the rule specify "NOT compliant" and the permit all rule specify "compliant".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that all checks out and still no luck I would try to reload the unit and see if that will straighten things out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:43:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982415#M286655</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T05:43:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982416#M286679</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Agent has been removed and installed numerous times. The compliance rules work perfect on 1.1. My compliant rule is matching a certificate subject and equals compliant. My non compilant provisioning rule matches the same certificate and equals not compliant. Put simply I am very confident in my configuration having spent the past 5-6 weeks straight working on this product and the fact that the identical config on 1.1 does not present the issue. Unit has been rebooted many times and has also been rebuilt from scratch on a fresh vm. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your assistance and suggestions on this task. I would understand completely if you give up on this one until a patch or new build is released. I am utilising 1.1 as it is more stable than 1.1.1 - but only just. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 06:01:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982416#M286679</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T06:01:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982417#M286697</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check your private messages.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 06:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982417#M286697</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T06:06:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982418#M286713</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;PM received and replied to. I have also tested the compliant policy with the equal compliant removed - the client matches the policy and connects successfully. It is definately posture/CoA related.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 06:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982418#M286713</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-01T06:21:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982419#M286725</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi , is that problem solved ?, i have the same problem , but it only happens with eap tls , the same configuration , but using peap , works fine , any sugestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:34:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982419#M286725</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Ferreira Fernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-17T19:34:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 1.1.1 Windows NAC client posture checking loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982420#M286748</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last week I tested on a number of machines and had the same issue yet at the same time other machines would work fine. I have no exact reason what is wrong with those builds that don't work but essentially it appears to be incompatibility. I have many issues related to client provisioning and posture with ISE in general mainly on mobile devices - for me deploying posture related services especially on wireless is at your own risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-1-1-1-windows-nac-client-posture-checking-loop/m-p/1982420#M286748</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen McBride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-19T22:39:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

