<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Are you just wanting basic in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867016#M36603</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you just wanting basic 802.1x authentication or will you also want to do posture assessment? What about guest/BYOD access?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joseph Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-19T15:36:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867015#M36598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are very close to purchasing Cisco ISE but I need to justify why I should choose it, specifcally over Microsoft NPS (which is free).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can anyone advise me on the benefits or possible issues that they may have encountered, with either product.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Simom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:41:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867015#M36598</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon Young</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T06:41:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are you just wanting basic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867016#M36603</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you just wanting basic 802.1x authentication or will you also want to do posture assessment? What about guest/BYOD access?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867016#M36603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Johnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-19T15:36:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi, sorry for the delay I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867017#M36609</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, sorry for the delay I have been out of the office.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think initially I was looking at 802.1x to secure wired connections and NPS is more than capable of this but&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have some reservations about the moniotoring troubleshooting of issues within NPS, specifically as I have different switches including Cisco, Juniper, HP and just the general interaction/setup&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been looking at ISE (evaulation) and like to the functionality as its similar to ACS which I already have.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It also seems to me that when you go beyond the basics, dot1x etc Cisco ISE comes into its own&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What I really want is a list of can/can't do. So I can compare the two and ultimately get someone to sigh off on the product&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:53:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise/m-p/2867017#M36609</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon Young</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-25T09:53:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

