<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic When you move to the next in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872515#M37163</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When you move to the next step of preparing the upgrade, ISE will prompt you to confirm that the MD5 checksum and SHA-256 hash are correct. the correct values are posted on Cisco's download page for the upgrade files.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;ise/admin# application upgrade prepare ise-upgradebundle-1.3.x-and-1.4.x-to-2.1.0.x.x86_64.tar.gz upgrade&lt;BR /&gt;Getting bundle to local machine...&lt;BR /&gt;md5: 35a159416afd0900c9da7b3dc6c72043&lt;BR /&gt;sha256: e3358ca424d977af67f8bb2bb3574b3e559ce9578d2f36c44cd8ba9e6dddfefd&lt;BR /&gt;% Please confirm above crypto hash matches what is posted on Cisco download site.&lt;BR /&gt;% Continue? Y/N [Y]&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:23:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-13T21:23:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.0 distributed deployment upgrade experiences</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872490#M37132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm getting ready to upgrade our 8 node ISE 1.3 deployment to 2.0. &amp;nbsp;I've followed the upgrade documentation to prepare for this but I was wondering if anyone has experience doing the 2.0 upgrade on a similar setup. &amp;nbsp; Do you have any experiences, issues, etc, you can share? &amp;nbsp;I'm particularly interested in how long it took. &amp;nbsp;We did set up a 2 node deployment in our lab but the upgrade was pretty quick, about 1 hour per server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872490#M37132</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ben.Levin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T06:35:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I've done several upgrades,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872491#M37133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've done several upgrades, from 1.2 up to and including to 2.0. Though the two upgrades I did to 2.0 were were basic 2-node deployments, they all went well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Release Notes and Upgrade Guides are quite thorough and accurate in my experience. Just be careful to follow them exactly. Have a full backup before beginning and be prepared to rejoin the deployment to AD (if you're using an AD identity store).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For 2.0, be sure to upgrade all the way to the current patch version (Cumulative Patch 2 as of right now).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872491#M37133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-18T01:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Marvin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872492#M37134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am planning to upgrade 1.4 to 2.1 version. we have distributed environment running on VMware setup. Could you please share the detailed&amp;nbsp;steps &amp;nbsp;pre-upgrade, upgrade and rollback in case of any issues. I have gone through many documents but, i don't find document to rollback to old version in case of any issues.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872492#M37134</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-15T01:02:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2.1 upgrade guide is</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872493#M37135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 2.1 upgrade guide is quite meticulous. Follow it and you will be well-served.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-1/upgrade_guide/b_ise_upgrade_guide_21.html&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as rollback, there is no "downgrade" that can be done in place. What Cisco recommends is to have a fresh full backup prior to starting the upgrade process. You can then use that on a fresh VM (of the old version) to restore to the previous state.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(Depending on your environment, you may also be able to use VMware snapshots.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, Cisco's current most stable release recommendation is 2.0 Patch 3 is you are not using Device Admin. 2.1 is recommended if you are using Device Admin. However, I find 2.1 &amp;nbsp;compelling due to the numerous improvements to the UI. Watch for 2.1 Patch 1 to come out (hopefully in the next several weeks) to address some of the bugs identified in 2.1. We've seen a few, but generally not show stoppers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 01:55:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872493#M37135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-15T01:55:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have gone through the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872494#M37137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have gone through the document. can you please confirm if below steps are correct to execute the upgrade process?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I skipped the commands: application upgrade prepare and application upgrade proceed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The upgrade sequence is&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI style="text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;secondary admin node&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI style="text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;PSN Node&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI style="text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Primary admin node:&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;step1: # copy repository_url/path/ise-upgradebundle-1.3.x-and-1.4.x-to-2.1.0.x.x86_64.tar.gz disk:/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;step2: # show repository upgrade (to ensure the file is in the local repository)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;step3: # application upgrade ise-upgradebundle-1.3.x-and-1.4.x-to-2.1.0.x.x86_64.tar.gz upgrade&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am not understanding what you mean Device admin (you said; &lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333; background: white;"&gt;2.1 is recommended if you are using Device Admin&lt;/SPAN&gt;). could you please brief about this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872494#M37137</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-15T19:01:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Joe,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872495#M37140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Joe,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The upgrade sequence is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. You should upgrade your Primary Admin Node first.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. If there are separate Monitoring Nodes, then Primary Monitoring Node should be upgraded next.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3.&amp;nbsp;Secondary Monitoring Node ( if there is one)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. If not, then you can upgrade PSN's and then your Secondary Admin Nodes..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, by Device Admin Marvin is referring to TACACS+ support on ISE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TACACS+ support came from ISE 2.0. You can read more about in the 2.0 release notes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A id="ext-gen223" href="https://tools.cisco.com/squish/665F1" onclick="return popitup(this)"&gt;https://tools.cisco.com/squish/665F1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please refer to &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-0/release_notes/ise20_rn.html#pgfId-591230"&gt;TACACS+ Device Administration&lt;/A&gt; Section.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, if the upgrade fails, the rollback will happen automatically on the devices. In case you do have any issues after upgrade, you will need to re-image the box. There is no command for rollback.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rajat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872495#M37140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajat Gupta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-15T21:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rajat,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872496#M37141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Rajat,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think you meant upgrade secondary PAN first.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Joe,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rajat is correct regarding what I was talking about regarding Device Admin.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From how you laid it out, it appears you have a 4-5 node deployment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Primary PAN/MnT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secondary PAN/MnT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Several PSNs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872496#M37141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-15T21:49:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Marvin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872497#M37142</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes. Listed it the other way round. Secondary PAN and then Primary Admin in the end.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rj&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872497#M37142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajat Gupta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-15T22:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First, i would like thank you</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872498#M37144</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;First, i would like thank you all for your help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;Hi Marvin,&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;Yes, you are correct, I have a deployment as follows.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;Primary PAN/MnT&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;Secondary PAN/MnT&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;Several PSNs&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;In that case, the upgrade sequence should be. First;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;Secondary PAN/MnT, 2nd;&amp;nbsp;PSNs and finally&amp;nbsp;Primary PAN/MnT. please correct me if I am wrong.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;One more clarification since I am going to perform this in live environment.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;1. after&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;Secondary PAN/MnT upgrade, it will be deregisters from&amp;nbsp;Primary PAN/MnT and it will become itself as primary admin/monitoring node. In that case, I hope this node will have all configuration and certificates remains and works as&amp;nbsp;Primary PAN/MnT.(in this stage we will have two&amp;nbsp;Primary PAN/MnT but no communication between them)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;2. After one PSN node upgrade, will this PSN node will register with&lt;SPAN class="apple-converted-space"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Secondary PAN/MnT(currently it is also&amp;nbsp;primary&amp;nbsp;PAN/MnT)? If yes, any request comes to this PSN will be authenticated through Secondary PAN/MnT(currently it is also&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;primary&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;PAN/MnT) ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px; margin: 0in 0in 7.5pt 0in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;3. after all the PSN are upgraded (in this stage only we left primary&lt;SPAN class="apple-converted-space"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;PAN/MnT upgrade), all this&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="outline: none;"&gt;this PSN node will be registered with Secondary PAN/MnT(currently it is also&amp;nbsp;primary&amp;nbsp;PAN/MnT)? If yes,&lt;SPAN class="apple-converted-space"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;all&amp;nbsp;request comes to this PSN will be authenticated through Secondary PAN/MnT(currently it is also&amp;nbsp;primary&amp;nbsp;PAN/MnT) ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872498#M37144</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T02:07:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your sequence is correct.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872499#M37145</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your sequence is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Correct. Technically they are two deployments during that interim point of some but not all nodes upgraded.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, when your upgrade the last node (Primary PAN/MnT of the original deployment) it will join the new deployment as Secondary PAN/MnT. If you want it te reclaim the primary role, you need to log into it and, under the deployment menu, "Promote to Primary". This is an optional step.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872499#M37145</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T02:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sorry, here is our deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872500#M37146</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry, here is our deployment :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node A:Primary PAN/secondary MnT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node B: Secondary PAN/primary MnT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node C,D,E and F: PSNs&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872500#M37146</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T02:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you so much Marvin. I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872501#M37147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much Marvin. I hope the upgrade sequence is still same for our deployment:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;here is our deployment :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node A:Primary PAN/secondary MnT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node B: Secondary PAN/primary MnT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Node C,D,E and F: PSNs&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The upgrade sequence is:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;secondary admin node/primary montitoring node&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;PSN Node&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Primary admin node/secondary admin node&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872501#M37147</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T02:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, still correct.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872502#M37148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, still correct.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:32:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872502#M37148</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T02:32:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you. i will share my</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872503#M37149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you. i will share my experience soon.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872503#M37149</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T02:35:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We're in the middle of the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872504#M37150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We're in the middle of the lab upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1, using the GUI upgrade method. &amp;nbsp;It seems better than using the CLI so far. However, my lab deployment only has 2 servers and production has 8, so I'm really not looking forward to how long that is going to take. I'm planning to open a TAC case to make sure we have the procedure down and try to get a better idea of how long it will take to finish all 8 servers. &amp;nbsp;When we upgraded from 1.3 to 2.0, it took us 13 hours.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:34:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872504#M37150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ben.Levin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-16T18:34:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Marvin,do you know which</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872505#M37151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333; background: white;"&gt;Hi Marvin,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif; color: #333333;"&gt;&lt;BR style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px;" /&gt; &lt;BR style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px;" /&gt; &lt;SPAN style="background: white;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;do you know which bugs will be addressed with the upcoming patch for ISE 2.1?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px;" /&gt; &lt;SPAN style="background: white;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;By the way, where can I get some "insider" information about when a update will be released?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="outline: none; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-spacing: 0px;" /&gt; &lt;SPAN style="background: white;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; widows: 2; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;As I have some minor bugs (and a missing deny profile for TACACS authorization) I have to deal with, I am waiting desperately for any new update &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872505#M37151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maximilian Usinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-17T07:28:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>@Maximilian Usinger  ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872506#M37152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[@usi.usinger]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The missing TACACS Deny profile was fixed in ISE 2.1. That was the following bug:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy46322&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have questions about specific bugs that are impacting your environment, you can inquire with your Cisco SE or via the TAC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sometimes you can tell that a bug fix is imminent when the Bug search tool shows it as "fixed" but the most recent public release doesn't include the fix. That usually indicates it's been fixed by Development Engineering and is pending release.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:47:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872506#M37152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-17T12:47:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>@Marvin Rhoads  ,Thanks for</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872507#M37153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[@mrhoads-cco]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; ,&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply, but I just found out that I am suffering from this fresh bug here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCva04654/?referring_site=bugquickviewredir" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCva04654/?referring_site=bugquickviewredir&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(In case you run&amp;nbsp;in a similiar problem)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was starting to get crazy, as everyone said this bug should have been fixed, but I couldn't find any deny shell profile. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 08:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872507#M37153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maximilian Usinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-19T08:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Marvin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872508#M37154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Need your help to clarify below query.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;when we use below command to copy the file to ISE(local disk). what is the setup do i&amp;nbsp;need to do on remote PC(where IOS bundle is available), do we need to setup FTP server?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;copy repository_url/path/ise-upgradebundle-1.3.x-and-1.4.x-to-2.1.0.x.x86_64.tar.gz disk:/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Repository_url = Repository Name&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Path = server IP address.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please clarify in detail. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872508#M37154</guid>
      <dc:creator>joevimal01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-13T10:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In the last 2 weeks I have</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872509#M37156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the last 2 weeks I have upgraded from ISE 1.2 -&amp;gt; 1.3&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;then 1.3 -&amp;gt; 2.0. finally 2.0 - 2.1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I used the same repository where I keep my backups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So in mycase CiscoISE is my repository&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"application upgrade prepare ise-upgradebundle-1.3.x-and-1.4.x-to-2.0.0.306.x86_64.tar.gz CiscoISE"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;once uploaded&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"application upgrade proceed"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but if you have done a upgrade in between remember to use&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"application upgrade cleanup"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Make sure you have a backup before you start, including your cert's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:59:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-0-distributed-deployment-upgrade-experiences/m-p/2872509#M37156</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Bosch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-13T14:59:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

