<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Do you mean PSN node group in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903379#M39275</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you mean PSN node group when you say 'host group'?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Licensing-wise, all nodes in a deployment share the ISE licenses installed on the PAN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:42:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-24T14:42:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE distributed deployment and Licensing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903378#M39274</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have 2 x&amp;nbsp;ISE-VM-K9= licenses and i want to deploy ISE in an Standalone mode with HA.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i.e have 2 boxes Node1 and Node2 each hosting all three personas and closely located in 1 data centre.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;then i want to have a third box node 3 in a remote data centre (only for DR purpose).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Whats the best way to design this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Have node 1 and node 3 in a host group and use as primary aaa then node 2 as secondary&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Have Node1 and 2 in a local host group, then host 3 as another entity&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm worried about the licensing requirement of the 2nd option&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sergeant&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903378#M39274</guid>
      <dc:creator>routexpert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T06:53:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do you mean PSN node group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903379#M39275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you mean PSN node group when you say 'host group'?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Licensing-wise, all nodes in a deployment share the ISE licenses installed on the PAN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:42:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903379#M39275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-24T14:42:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes PSN node group</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903380#M39276</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes PSN node group&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thats great Marvin..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;that answers my concern&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-distributed-deployment-and-licensing/m-p/2903380#M39276</guid>
      <dc:creator>routexpert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-24T14:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

