<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Perfect, thanks Jan in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922828#M39698</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Perfect, thanks Jan&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Radius:NAS-Port-Id Starts with GigabitEthernet1/0/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Terry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 11:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-31T11:10:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Authorization Condition</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922826#M39694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a requirement to setup ISE in such a way that it differentiates between switches within a switch stack. Does anyone know if there is an expression that I could use within an authorization compound condition that will achieve the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If a device using MAB connects to switch 1 in the stack it will be assigned to VLAN 10.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If the same device connects to switch 2 in the same stack it will be assigned to VLAN 20.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Terry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922826#M39694</guid>
      <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T06:49:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You could use the interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922827#M39695</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could use the interface numbering as a condition, the switch does not send any information about stack numbering. I don't remember the specific av pair, but you should be able to find it in the live log details.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922827#M39695</guid>
      <dc:creator>jan.nielsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-30T21:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Perfect, thanks Jan</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922828#M39698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Perfect, thanks Jan&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Radius:NAS-Port-Id Starts with GigabitEthernet1/0/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Terry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 11:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-authorization-condition/m-p/2922828#M39698</guid>
      <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-31T11:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

