https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/supplicant-blacklisting/m-p/2845729#M40643 <P>Hi!</P> <P></P> <P>Does anyone have documentation regarding blacklisting after a supplicant fails the authentication and posturing put in place?</P> <P></P> <P>Will it be port-based, or will a supplicant be able to plug into another switch port and begin the EAP authentication process all over again?</P> <P></P> <P></P> <P></P> <P>Thanks in advance!</P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:26:39 GMT andrewsigna 2019-03-11T06:26:39Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/supplicant-blacklisting/m-p/2845729#M40643 <P>Hi!</P> <P></P> <P>Does anyone have documentation regarding blacklisting after a supplicant fails the authentication and posturing put in place?</P> <P></P> <P>Will it be port-based, or will a supplicant be able to plug into another switch port and begin the EAP authentication process all over again?</P> <P></P> <P></P> <P></P> <P>Thanks in advance!</P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:26:39 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/supplicant-blacklisting/m-p/2845729#M40643 andrewsigna 2019-03-11T06:26:39Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/supplicant-blacklisting/m-p/2845730#M40644 <P>Blacklisting is different from AuthC failure.</P> <P>The default check for blacklist happens before the main (or customized) AuthC/AuthZ actions.</P> <P>A client that was denied access but not blacklisted can (generally) keep trying over and again.</P> Tue, 02 Feb 2016 05:31:51 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/supplicant-blacklisting/m-p/2845730#M40644 Marvin Rhoads 2016-02-02T05:31:51Z