<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Secure ACS redundancy in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848793#M408215</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i have no secondary ACS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yatisspor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-20T12:33:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure ACS redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848791#M408213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What happens if my only ACS goes down? ACS is active on my access switches. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848791#M408213</guid>
      <dc:creator>yatisspor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T22:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure ACS redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848792#M408214</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Request will go to secondary acs. If switch tries to authenticate  , request first goes to primary acs, but if there is no response from that acs, switch will send that request to secondary acs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~JG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do rate helpful posts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848792#M408214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jagdeep Gambhir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-19T16:49:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure ACS redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848793#M408215</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i have no secondary ACS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848793#M408215</guid>
      <dc:creator>yatisspor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-20T12:33:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure ACS redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848794#M408216</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What deployment scenario are we talking about here? For example, with 802.1X deployments there is a feature (called Inaccessible Authentication Bypass) that allows you to provide access to a specific VLAN in the scenario where connectivity to the ACS server is compromised. Is that something may help you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:02:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/secure-acs-redundancy/m-p/848794#M408216</guid>
      <dc:creator>ardica</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-20T15:02:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

