<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Port security &amp; dot1x in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911083#M408845</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried looking at your AAA server's failure logging capabilities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this for troubleshooting? Unfortunately, the switch may not have all the details on why the session fails ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:14:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jafrazie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-24T22:14:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Port security &amp; dot1x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911082#M408844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to set up dot1x with MAC authentication bypass (MAB) on a C3560, and I want the switch to send a SNMP trap upon authentication failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q: Can port security and MAB be combined in this way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Leo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911082#M408844</guid>
      <dc:creator>etxlews-SE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T22:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Port security &amp; dot1x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911083#M408845</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried looking at your AAA server's failure logging capabilities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this for troubleshooting? Unfortunately, the switch may not have all the details on why the session fails ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:14:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911083#M408845</guid>
      <dc:creator>jafrazie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-24T22:14:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Port security &amp; dot1x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911084#M408846</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, I have not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My intention was to test the concept: can the switch send a trap when a Radius-reject is received?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it be possible to define such a (security violation) action together with dot1x?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Leo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/port-security-dot1x/m-p/911084#M408846</guid>
      <dc:creator>etxlews-SE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-25T14:55:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

