<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: dot1x guest-vlan issues with windows XP in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803448#M419962</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, first WRT the documentation reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not entirely accurate. If a host fails to respond to the authenticator, the port remains in the connecting state for [tx-period  (max-reauth-req + 1)] seconds. A login window even appearing on an XP machine is dependent on the configuration (usually only occurs with MD5). Not sure about the unplugging cables stuff at all ;-). This certainly shouldn't be in there though, since that's not really a workaround for anything. It is correct in saying that 1X-capable hosts should not be placed in the Guest-VLAN. It's also correct in explaining the quiet period during the HELD state after a failed authentication attempt. However, the rest is completely dependent on the Microsoft supplicant. The Microsoft supplicant gives up on 1X entirely after it fails 3 times in a row. No other supplicants do this AFAIK. Since it gives up on 1X, then that explains why the port would be "stuck" in a connecting state. Not sure if this is just trivia or what though in context to the reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WRT your configuration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're interested in having 1X timeout any quicker than it does now (see formula above) then the only timers/values you need to bother with are tx-period and/or max-reauth-req. supp-timeout is for non-EAP control packets. The quiet-period is how long the port is in a HELD state when it fails authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this help?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jafrazie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-07-17T17:09:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>dot1x guest-vlan issues with windows XP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803445#M419959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have dot1x setup on a 3560. I basically have 3 vlans configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All ports are in vlan "guest (vlan 10)" by default. The authenticated "AUTH" vlan is pushed by the radius server after successful authentication. And finally I have a guest/auth-fail vlan for non-dot1x capable machines. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything works fine except that when I connect windows XP machine which is not on the domain then I am not assigned to a guest vlan. The port stays in unauthorized state and a "show interface" output shows that the port is up but line protocol is down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It works sometimes but other times it doesnt. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a trick to it. Also I read an article on ciscos website which was specific to XP and dot1x i.e. the switches waits ~ 180 seconds and you need to plug the cable in/out of the switch to make it to work...I havent tried this yet but anybody has any better ideas then  this technique.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the standard config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int fa0/1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x port-control auto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x guest-vlan 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x auth-fail vlan 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking of tweaking the "quite period" and the switch-to-client retransmission timeout values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: Like I mentioned earlier. After successful authentication corporate clients are put in the correct vlan. Its just the "guest" vlan piece which is not working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts? pointers? Comments?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803445#M419959</guid>
      <dc:creator>smhussain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T22:16:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dot1x guest-vlan issues with windows XP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803446#M419960</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Guest-VLAN literally means the VLAN you place a machine in when the device on the other end of the wire cannot speak 1X. The switch figures this out by not getting any response to EAPOL-Identity-Request frames. It takes 90-sec by default for this to happen. If a machine who can speak 1X, or who at least replies to the initial Requests of Identity defined by RFC 3748, then this machine should never go into the Guest-VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Auth-Fail-VLAN literally means, 802.1X actually worked and completed, but a negative result or denial of service is typically sought after. But in this case, you don't want to deny service entirely, and instead place the port into a VLAN anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you Fwd the reference about this ~180sec thing? Doesn't sound like it makes since, so keen on fixing that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, not sure I can say what your supplicant is actually doing, or how it's configured, but do the above definitions help at least?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:20:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803446#M419960</guid>
      <dc:creator>jafrazie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-17T16:20:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dot1x guest-vlan issues with windows XP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803447#M419961</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am aware of the use of auth and guest vlan however I was not quite puzzled about the wait time for the switch before which it assigns non-speaking dot1x machines in the guest vlan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am aware about the 62 sec dhcp process and how that ties into this issue as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The timeout as you mentioned is 90 seconds ( I thought this was 120) (30 x2 (retries) = 60 x 2 (total retries) = 120.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However I am planning of changing the following timeouts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x timeout tx-period 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x timeout supp-timeout 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x timeout quiet-period 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dot1x max-reauth-req 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the document I was referring to. Although it covers 4000 series. I am not sure if it applies to others as well. Atleast in my case with the 3560 it 'appears' to apply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4000/8.3and8.4glx/configuration/guide/8021x.html#wp1021033" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4000/8.3and8.4glx/configuration/guide/8021x.html#wp1021033&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803447#M419961</guid>
      <dc:creator>smhussain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-17T16:55:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dot1x guest-vlan issues with windows XP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803448#M419962</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, first WRT the documentation reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not entirely accurate. If a host fails to respond to the authenticator, the port remains in the connecting state for [tx-period  (max-reauth-req + 1)] seconds. A login window even appearing on an XP machine is dependent on the configuration (usually only occurs with MD5). Not sure about the unplugging cables stuff at all ;-). This certainly shouldn't be in there though, since that's not really a workaround for anything. It is correct in saying that 1X-capable hosts should not be placed in the Guest-VLAN. It's also correct in explaining the quiet period during the HELD state after a failed authentication attempt. However, the rest is completely dependent on the Microsoft supplicant. The Microsoft supplicant gives up on 1X entirely after it fails 3 times in a row. No other supplicants do this AFAIK. Since it gives up on 1X, then that explains why the port would be "stuck" in a connecting state. Not sure if this is just trivia or what though in context to the reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WRT your configuration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're interested in having 1X timeout any quicker than it does now (see formula above) then the only timers/values you need to bother with are tx-period and/or max-reauth-req. supp-timeout is for non-EAP control packets. The quiet-period is how long the port is in a HELD state when it fails authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this help?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803448#M419962</guid>
      <dc:creator>jafrazie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-17T17:09:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dot1x guest-vlan issues with windows XP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803449#M419963</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed the dot1x timers and it appears to be working now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/dot1x-guest-vlan-issues-with-windows-xp/m-p/803449#M419963</guid>
      <dc:creator>smhussain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-31T03:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

