<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACS 4.x and LDAP as userdatabase in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662868#M421485</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take your point.. its a balance between functionality verses security.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco could choose to add a cludge solution. But generally the golden rule of all password repositories should be passwords go in - never out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since LDAP itself cant/wont support MSCHAP natively you need to implement a "back door" to allow plain text passwords out of LDAP back into the AAA server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You then have issues of password management, but more importantly.. how secure is the system you will have built?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>darpotter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-28T11:11:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACS 4.x and LDAP as userdatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662865#M421482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know when/if Cisco plan to let LDAP support PEAP(mschapv2)? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are running Novell, and it seems that we have to use Freeradius because PEAP w/mschap v.2 is not supported when LDAP is the userdatabase&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_user_guide_chapter09186a00806fe24a.html#wp857274" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_user_guide_chapter09186a00806fe24a.html#wp857274&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Johann Folkestad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662865#M421482</guid>
      <dc:creator>johannf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T22:00:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS 4.x and LDAP as userdatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662866#M421483</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its not a matter of Cisco allowing it. LDAP databases dont generally support MSCHAP despite (during my time at Cisco) constant nagging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess if enough customers moaned loud enough at the LDAP vendors they might support it natively.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only way I know it can be made to work is a very nasty hack where the LDAP db basically has to store another value which the AAA server requests (and treats as a password) in order to do the MSCHAP locally. So you also end up with 2 passwords for each user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do this you might as well let anyone on your network. Afterall, if your AAA server can get the password... who else can?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662866#M421483</guid>
      <dc:creator>darpotter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-27T13:39:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS 4.x and LDAP as userdatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662867#M421484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK thanks, but then I don't understand that Freeradius support MSCHAP, and ACS does'nt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JF&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:39:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662867#M421484</guid>
      <dc:creator>johannf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T07:39:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS 4.x and LDAP as userdatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662868#M421485</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take your point.. its a balance between functionality verses security.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco could choose to add a cludge solution. But generally the golden rule of all password repositories should be passwords go in - never out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since LDAP itself cant/wont support MSCHAP natively you need to implement a "back door" to allow plain text passwords out of LDAP back into the AAA server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You then have issues of password management, but more importantly.. how secure is the system you will have built?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-x-and-ldap-as-userdatabase/m-p/662868#M421485</guid>
      <dc:creator>darpotter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T11:11:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

