<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic aaa authorization bypass in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645527#M422604</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is their a command that will bypass the aaa authorization from a particular host? I would like to use something like the aaa mac-exempt command, but have it only exempt on the authorization part. Background: i have a firewall management station that pushes out policies (configs) with over 2000 commands, and if i was to do this to say 500 firewalls... i could have 1000's of authorization statements to authorize. I would like to do the proper aaa authentication against this mgmt server, but have the nas ignore the authorization part.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>matt.walls</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:48:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>aaa authorization bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645527#M422604</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is their a command that will bypass the aaa authorization from a particular host? I would like to use something like the aaa mac-exempt command, but have it only exempt on the authorization part. Background: i have a firewall management station that pushes out policies (configs) with over 2000 commands, and if i was to do this to say 500 firewalls... i could have 1000's of authorization statements to authorize. I would like to do the proper aaa authentication against this mgmt server, but have the nas ignore the authorization part.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645527#M422604</guid>
      <dc:creator>matt.walls</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:48:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aaa authorization bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645528#M422606</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is a interesting scenario. I can imagine that other config Management servers would need this such as Ciscoworks LMS, QPM and ISC. I believe this would be a specific config in aaa section - can you attach your aaa config and send, so i can investigate - i would like test in a lab. Also , are we using ACS 4.0?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645528#M422606</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvanvuuren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-25T07:43:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aaa authorization bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645529#M422607</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would agree, would be nice to have aaa statement to ignore aaa authorization from a specific mac/ip/or something like that, but not to ignore the aaa authentication.  I have some firewall configurations with over 3000 lines, so when I do a firewall config change my policy server has to re-write all those lines of code... and that means 3000 aaa authorization requests/responses.  Here are configs... We use unix version of tacacs+.  Thank you for any assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;============================================&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(PIX 7.x configuration)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server TACACS+ (outside) host x.x.x.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     key xxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     server-port xxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authentication ssh console TACACS+ LOCAL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authentication serial console TACACS+ LOCAL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authentication enable console TACACS+ LOCAL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authorization command TACACS+ LOCAL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;========================================&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(TACACS+ configuration)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;group = FULLPRIV {&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;default service = permit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service = shell {&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cmd=enable {&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit .*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;enable = ldap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645529#M422607</guid>
      <dc:creator>matt.walls</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-25T12:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aaa authorization bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645530#M422608</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see why you might want to do this, but you'd effectively be building-in your own security vulnerability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Often, security is mutually exclusive with ease of use &amp;amp; performance &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As it happens I cant think of a way to implement this in ACS windows/appliance. Would probably need something configured on the device to make it not try to authorise commands from a specific address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Darran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645530#M422608</guid>
      <dc:creator>darpotter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-27T08:18:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aaa authorization bypass</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645531#M422609</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe this is possible if the device in question is a Cisco PIX as you can use the command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa authorization include &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not aware of this being available on a Cisco IOS Router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/aaa-authorization-bypass/m-p/645531#M422609</guid>
      <dc:creator>elliott.fougman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T11:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

