<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: auth-proxy and &amp;quot;aaa uthorization exec&amp;quot; in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-proxy-and-quot-aaa-uthorization-exec-quot/m-p/482201#M428483</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not seen the book, but I feel that they are two different things and need not be configured together. For auth-proxy to work, all you need is "aaa authorization auth-proxy......." and corresponding configuration on the AAA server for the users. If you want to control access to the router itself, then use "aaa authorization exec......" as you suggest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In conclusion, though they are not related and configured together, I agree with you that it is a good practice to have control on who can have exec access to the router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vkapoor5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-09-15T18:35:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>auth-proxy and "aaa uthorization exec"</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-proxy-and-quot-aaa-uthorization-exec-quot/m-p/482200#M428479</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In page 610 of "CCIE practical studies: Security" for Dimetry Bokotey:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"when configuring aaa authorization auth-proxy, ensure that aaa authorization isn't enabled as well......"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this is wrong argument. In fact, you should enable the exec authorization, otherwise the autth-proxy user will get access to the router exec, which is not desireable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:18:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-proxy-and-quot-aaa-uthorization-exec-quot/m-p/482200#M428479</guid>
      <dc:creator>hbahaidara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:18:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: auth-proxy and "aaa uthorization exec"</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-proxy-and-quot-aaa-uthorization-exec-quot/m-p/482201#M428483</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not seen the book, but I feel that they are two different things and need not be configured together. For auth-proxy to work, all you need is "aaa authorization auth-proxy......." and corresponding configuration on the AAA server for the users. If you want to control access to the router itself, then use "aaa authorization exec......" as you suggest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In conclusion, though they are not related and configured together, I agree with you that it is a good practice to have control on who can have exec access to the router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-proxy-and-quot-aaa-uthorization-exec-quot/m-p/482201#M428483</guid>
      <dc:creator>vkapoor5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-15T18:35:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

