<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ACS Redundancy in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461531#M428532</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to run a second ACS as a redundancy? I found nothing about this in the documentation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MARTIN FUNKE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:17:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACS Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461531#M428532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to run a second ACS as a redundancy? I found nothing about this in the documentation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461531#M428532</guid>
      <dc:creator>MARTIN FUNKE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461532#M428533</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it is quite possible to run a second ACS and provide redundancy. At a customer site where I work we run two servers with ACS. Our routers and switches attempt to authenticate with one server and if they get no response then they attempt to authenticate with the redundant server. It works very well for us.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461532#M428533</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-06T12:14:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461533#M428534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to take a look at the Replication options under &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;System Config --&amp;gt; CiscoSecure Database Replication&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will allow the redundant server to be kept in step with the master server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is also worth considering the second server not to simply provide redundancy but also to take some of the load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Half devices pointing at server A, failing back to Server B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tht other half of devices pointing at server B, failing back to Server A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-redundancy/m-p/461533#M428534</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrewclymer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-16T09:47:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

