<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Large IP Pool in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/large-ip-pool/m-p/338156#M429313</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are in a project of deploying 10.000 clients into the field. We want to assign a B class IP Pool(178.17.X.X) for this group of users. But as far as I know, CS ACS Win can support an IP Pool of whole C Class at most. Is there a configuration option or a workaround to solve this issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best tegards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>faktas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:06:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Large IP Pool</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/large-ip-pool/m-p/338156#M429313</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are in a project of deploying 10.000 clients into the field. We want to assign a B class IP Pool(178.17.X.X) for this group of users. But as far as I know, CS ACS Win can support an IP Pool of whole C Class at most. Is there a configuration option or a workaround to solve this issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best tegards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/large-ip-pool/m-p/338156#M429313</guid>
      <dc:creator>faktas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T21:06:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Large IP Pool</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/large-ip-pool/m-p/338157#M429317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, ACS only allows a C-class subnet to be added in as a pool of addresses.  If you want to add an entire B-class you'd have to add multiple pools, something like the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippool0 from 178.18.0.1-178.18.0.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippool1 from 178.18.1.1-178.18.1.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippool2 from 178.18.2.1-178.18.2.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippool254 from 178.18.254.1-178.18.254.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ippool255 from 178.18.255.1-178.18.255.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then under the ACS group you would move all these pools into the Selected Pools column, so ACS will assign the IP address out of a first available pool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/large-ip-pool/m-p/338157#M429317</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfullage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-18T01:12:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

