<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSUNIX in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/csunix/m-p/297330#M433693</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I wich to remain on a UNIX platform and not move to the Windows platform, What are my short term and long term options?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lat5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T20:46:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSUNIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/csunix/m-p/297330#M433693</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I wich to remain on a UNIX platform and not move to the Windows platform, What are my short term and long term options?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/csunix/m-p/297330#M433693</guid>
      <dc:creator>lat5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T20:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSUNIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/csunix/m-p/297331#M433695</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as my knowledge goes, it is just the difference in look and feel. Functionality wise, both are same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 19:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/csunix/m-p/297331#M433695</guid>
      <dc:creator>umedryk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-09-09T19:46:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

