<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ACS 4.1 eval before migration... in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525382#M440667</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have just received this from the partner:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'We have a critical case with Vodafone Egypt, they have a deployed Cisco ACS 4.1 but now it’s down due to hardware failure, they need to deploy a Cisco ACS virtual appliance as a temp solution till they finish their migration, so we are seeking your support to provide a temp license for Cisco ACS virtual appliance for about 1000 nodes.'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have made them fully aware of ACS EOS/EOL. Is there anything that we can do for them in this situation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2017 20:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paulturn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-17T20:00:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACS 4.1 eval before migration...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525382#M440667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have just received this from the partner:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'We have a critical case with Vodafone Egypt, they have a deployed Cisco ACS 4.1 but now it’s down due to hardware failure, they need to deploy a Cisco ACS virtual appliance as a temp solution till they finish their migration, so we are seeking your support to provide a temp license for Cisco ACS virtual appliance for about 1000 nodes.'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have made them fully aware of ACS EOS/EOL. Is there anything that we can do for them in this situation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2017 20:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525382#M440667</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulturn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-17T20:00:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS 4.1 eval before migration...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525383#M440670</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Building such an old system is harder than you might think. I had a customer recently with the same request.&amp;nbsp; Cisco doesn't have such old media lying around.&amp;nbsp; And I don't blame them.&amp;nbsp; Even if you could get your hands on an ACS 4.1 .iso (google is your friend &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt; then you'll face lots of other challenges with installing the ancient Windows OS, and worst of all, the AD integration is a nightmare.&amp;nbsp; You're going into a time warp and it's not pretty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better off downloading ISE 2.2 eval and using the resources at hand to build a modern system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525383#M440670</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-17T23:25:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS 4.1 eval before migration...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525384#M440672</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACS 4.1 is no longer supported for many years and has no eval licensing option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arne is correct. ISE provides T+ since 2.0 so should be used for eval instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:20:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525384#M440672</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-18T02:20:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACS 4.1 eval before migration...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525385#M440673</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arne/hslai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for the quick responses. The partner has asked if they can use an ACS 5.8 OVA with eval license for 1000 nodes instead as part of the migration. I have suggested using ISE to do the eval, just covering both angles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:06:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/acs-4-1-eval-before-migration/m-p/3525385#M440673</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulturn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-18T08:06:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

