<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PSN node groups and posture in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4018597#M441750</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;If such a configuration is not yet supported, what is the data that is being shared when PSNs are run in a node group configuration?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 05:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-27T05:29:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PSN node groups and posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4009525#M441714</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;I am using PSN node groups of 2 PSN in it.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;So, when an endpoint authenticates from PSN1 and Posture is run from PSN2, then it should not report NotApplicable as posture status on ISE.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;What are your views in case of posture using this PSN node groups? Would they also share the posture session data?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;Or is this something that is not yet supported?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;Thank you,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4009525#M441714</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T19:12:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PSN node groups and posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4010892#M441726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ISE is not currently supporting the use case you are describing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4010892#M441726</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T02:06:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PSN node groups and posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4018597#M441750</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="verdana,geneva" size="2"&gt;If such a configuration is not yet supported, what is the data that is being shared when PSNs are run in a node group configuration?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 05:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/psn-node-groups-and-posture/m-p/4018597#M441750</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-27T05:29:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

