<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ISE max session in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4028595#M453982</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't understand the question. Are you talking about a RADIUS Proxy or a network proxy?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As per the document shared, the Max Sessions applies to external identity sources as well, so session using a RADIUS Proxy would likely be affected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you're talking about a network proxy, that would be an independent system that ISE would not have any control over.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-12T21:57:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE max session</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4027358#M453979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are using version 2.2 with latest patch in distributed deployment. We want to use max sessions feature&amp;nbsp;but I am not sure about some tuning. After unchecking the unlimited session and setting a maximum of 3 sessions per user, in addition to if we limit the maximum session to 5 per group or per user within the group, which of these restrictions applies to the local user?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4027358#M453979</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sp@wn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-11T09:14:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE max session</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4027811#M453980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The User Max will take precedence. See the following TechNote for examples:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine-22/204463-Configure-Maximum-Concurrent-User-Sessio.html" target="_self"&gt;Configure Maximum Concurrent User Sessions on ISE 2.2&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also note that the Max Session cache is not synced across PSNs. Using this feature in a large distributed deployment may have unpredictable effects if the user/group sessions can be spread across multiple PSNs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Greg&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:47:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4027811#M453980</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-11T20:47:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE max session</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4027980#M453981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp; grgibbs,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer. As a last question do you have any idea about max session effect on external proxy?&amp;nbsp;I guess the setting on the external proxy should be valid in this regard, but does it have an overwhelming advantage here as in the local group?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4027980#M453981</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sp@wn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-12T06:57:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE max session</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4028595#M453982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't understand the question. Are you talking about a RADIUS Proxy or a network proxy?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As per the document shared, the Max Sessions applies to external identity sources as well, so session using a RADIUS Proxy would likely be affected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you're talking about a network proxy, that would be an independent system that ISE would not have any control over.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4028595#M453982</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-12T21:57:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE max session</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4028801#M453983</link>
      <description>ofcourse I am talking about radius proxy. I was read the external identity part but I wanted to be sure. yesterday I had an opportunity to test it and saw that users coming via radius proxy are not affected by this feature.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 06:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-max-session/m-p/4028801#M453983</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sp@wn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-13T06:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

