<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE 2.7 roadmap for gold image in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003630#M454806</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Official Cisco recommended release is 2.6 for new deployments unless you need a feature in 2.7&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2.6 and 2.7 are both a long term release. &amp;nbsp;This is contrary to the odd/even numbering outlined some time ago.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Nobody can give you an answer to this conundrum- you need to test and make sure it works for your use cases.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 12:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-26T12:33:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.7 roadmap for gold image</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003549#M454804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need recommendation for whether we need to go with ISE 2.7 for the new ISE deployments ? or shall we stick to the 2.6 patch 2 as gold image ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are the road maps for ISE 2.7, we don't need to stuck with upgrade once we get into productions after a month.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 09:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003549#M454804</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnabeel@ciso.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-26T09:27:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.7 roadmap for gold image</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003630#M454806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Official Cisco recommended release is 2.6 for new deployments unless you need a feature in 2.7&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2.6 and 2.7 are both a long term release. &amp;nbsp;This is contrary to the odd/even numbering outlined some time ago.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Nobody can give you an answer to this conundrum- you need to test and make sure it works for your use cases.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 12:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003630#M454806</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-26T12:33:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.7 roadmap for gold image</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003643#M454809</link>
      <description>Thanks for your response, actually this particular project I am doing wireless integration with Aruba where we might avoid the posturing with redirection method and use call home list, I see that LSD enhancement in 2.7 that could help me out on call home list scenarios. Any suggestions particularly for LSD feature.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 13:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003643#M454809</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnabeel@ciso.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-26T13:30:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.7 roadmap for gold image</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003787#M454890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2.6 introduced the lightweight session directory, if that's all you're after, then 2.6 would be suitable.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;LSD wouldn't change the way that I design an ISE deployment at this point.&amp;nbsp; It's still not a replacement for deployment connectivity.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-roadmap-for-gold-image/m-p/4003787#M454890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-26T21:40:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

