<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hybrid / Medium Deployment PSN limit in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998235#M455025</link>
    <description>ISE will not stop you from adding more PSN's in a hybrid deployment. However as you alluded to, this is the BU tested and TAC supported soft limit.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-13T00:02:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hybrid / Medium Deployment PSN limit</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998198#M455024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi team&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for this type of deploymet, there is a limit of&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;lt;=5 PSNs. Can you please confirm if this is a hard limit inforced in ISE, or just what TAC will support up to?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mark&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998198#M455024</guid>
      <dc:creator>mapretty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-12T22:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hybrid / Medium Deployment PSN limit</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998235#M455025</link>
      <description>ISE will not stop you from adding more PSN's in a hybrid deployment. However as you alluded to, this is the BU tested and TAC supported soft limit.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998235#M455025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-13T00:02:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hybrid / Medium Deployment PSN limit</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998255#M455026</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks Damien!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 01:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998255#M455026</guid>
      <dc:creator>mapretty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-13T01:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hybrid / Medium Deployment PSN limit</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998523#M455027</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;ISE will not stop you from adding more PSN's in a hybrid deployment. However as you alluded to, this is the BU tested and TAC supported soft limit.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I agree, please take a look at resources at &lt;A href="http://cs.co/ise-training" target="_blank"&gt;http://cs.co/ise-training&lt;/A&gt; BRKSEC-3432 and the ISE perf scale page&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://cs.co/ise-perf-scale" target="_blank"&gt;https://cs.co/ise-perf-scale&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/hybrid-medium-deployment-psn-limit/m-p/3998523#M455027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-13T15:34:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

