<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE 2.4 Patch 0 - CPU and Memory problems in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989002#M455402</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;sorry, as you said mis typo. It is patch 9&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:12:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:12:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.4 Patch 9 - CPU and Memory problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3988994#M455397</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 ISE nodes (Active/Standby PAN) and both are PSN. Month ago I had a weird problem: Memory in my first node was in 90 percentages although 802.1x were not deployed on network, I mean it was idle, only pxGrid was used. I opened a TAC case for that and after one day of opening the case, I noticed that Memory downgraded to 30s% that was awesome &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today I got notified that users are claiming that they cannot authenticate and access Wifi for 10 mins and then everything turned to be okay. I checked ISE which showed very high "Authentication Latency" for that period. While I was investigating the problem, ISE stopped to show system summary for that node:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 576px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/62168iB8828524F5D14340/image-dimensions/576x169?v=v2" width="576" height="169" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I connected to node via SSH and checked system utilization there and noticed one process is taking huge amount of CPU:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Captusre.PNG" style="width: 806px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/62169i762906ED996E92F2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Captusre.PNG" alt="Captusre.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not know what can be cause of the problem? Am i hitting any bug? I think I have to do reboot but I wanted to make sure before doing it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3988994#M455397</guid>
      <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:10:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 Patch 0 - CPU and Memory problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3988997#M455398</link>
      <description>All troubleshooting break fix priority needs to go through TAC&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why are you running patch 0!? You should be on latest patch unless tac says otherwise&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3988997#M455398</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:05:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 Patch 0 - CPU and Memory problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3988999#M455399</link>
      <description>Are you actually running 2.4 with no patches?  Or was that a typo and you meant patch 10? It would be highly recommended that you patch the deployment to patch 10 if you are not there already.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are hundreds of fixed bugs, of which, quite a few present symptoms like you are seeing.  If you are running patch 10, there is an unpatched memory leak that can also cause similar features.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3988999#M455399</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:07:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 Patch 0 - CPU and Memory problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989000#M455400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/199790"&gt;@Jason Kunst&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;sorry, my bad. It was typing error. I am.using patch 9&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989000#M455400</guid>
      <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:11:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 Patch 0 - CPU and Memory problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989002#M455402</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;sorry, as you said mis typo. It is patch 9&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:12:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989002#M455402</guid>
      <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:12:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.4 Patch 0 - CPU and Memory problems</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989019#M455404</link>
      <description>You may be impacted by this memory leak &lt;A href="https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvo87602" target="_blank"&gt;https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvo87602&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You would have to open a tac case to confirm, a fix is coming in a later patch and the temporary solution is to reload affected nodes.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Patch 10 resolved 101 bugs that patch 9 did not.  It would still be beneficial to move to it to rule them out.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-4/release_notes/b_ise_24_rn.html#id_122459" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-4/release_notes/b_ise_24_rn.html#id_122459&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-4-patch-9-cpu-and-memory-problems/m-p/3989019#M455404</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T16:36:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

