<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987804#M455489</link>
    <description>Pxgrid nodes count as nodes as you can see from his image&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a deployment of 5 psn nodes in a hybrid 2 could be designated out of the 5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a large deployment you can use up to 4 out of the 50&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-22T11:00:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987517#M455470</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need someone to confirm one thing about deployment for 9 PSNs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I remember from most of the presentations that whenever you have more than 5 PSN you need to split PAN from MnT&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so how to interpret the following pictures?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;different presentations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does the first one say that if I have 2x PAN/MNT (no pxGrid) + i.e. 9x PSN + 0xPxGrid subscribers - is that supported or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the 2nd one is old&amp;nbsp; guide which means max of 5 PSN for 2x PAN/MNT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="psn1.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/62043iC5926D67FFDF9E5B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="psn1.png" alt="psn1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="psn2.png" style="width: 971px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/62044i248CF36056871D54/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="psn2.png" alt="psn2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:15:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987517#M455470</guid>
      <dc:creator>Przemyslaw Konitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-21T21:15:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987548#M455475</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have the PAN and MNT roles hosted on the same appliance/VM, then you can only have five additional nodes, 7 total including the PAN/MNTs.&amp;nbsp;Any more than that and you need to put the PAN/MNT role on their own appliances or VM's.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In your case if you want 9 PSN's, then you need the PAN and MNT roles on their own dedicated nodes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2x pan&lt;BR /&gt;2x mnt&lt;BR /&gt;9x psn&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987548#M455475</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-21T22:23:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987554#M455480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have to admit I had not seen the slide from that BRKSEC-2430 session - I can see the confusion here. It does say "15 Max Subscriber nodes in a combined PAN/MnT scenario".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When did that come about? I have seen customers do this in the wild, but I thought it was a non-compliant deployment model&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987554#M455480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-21T22:27:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987557#M455482</link>
      <description>Those aren't PSN counts, those are pxgrid v1 connection limits per deployment model/size.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:34:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987557#M455482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-21T22:34:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987566#M455485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/320219"&gt;@Damien Miller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- thanks for clarifying that &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987566#M455485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-21T22:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987749#M455486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thx Damien for reply,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a question though.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I though that in terms of pxgrid subscribes there was a limit of 4 of them&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so how does that count?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="psn3.png" style="width: 902px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/62063iD6C8DDCEE98B2F73/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="psn3.png" alt="psn3.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987749#M455486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Przemyslaw Konitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-22T09:09:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987751#M455487</link>
      <description>ok I misunderstood what you wrote - pxGrid external connections / systems not the nodes itself. Right?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987751#M455487</guid>
      <dc:creator>Przemyslaw Konitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-22T09:12:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987804#M455489</link>
      <description>Pxgrid nodes count as nodes as you can see from his image&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a deployment of 5 psn nodes in a hybrid 2 could be designated out of the 5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In a large deployment you can use up to 4 out of the 50&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987804#M455489</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-22T11:00:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment with 9 PSNs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987849#M455491</link>
      <description>^this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can see how the confusion could start, in pxgrid we call connections subscribers. Overlapping terminology to psn nodes subscribing to the PAN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pxgrid subscriber = pxg connection&lt;BR /&gt;Psn subscriber = psn node&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pxgrid v1 had very poor scale, so it lists between 2 and 25 external "subscribers" (Max pxg connections). Unrelated to pxgrid/psn node count.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-with-9-psns/m-p/3987849#M455491</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-22T12:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

