<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AnyConnect client provisioning policy in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3957051#M455738</link>
    <description>It is mandatory to configure client provisioning policy and portal irrespective of whether or not you use redirect or redirect less posture since it is required to push any updates to the posture profile/AnyConnect updates etc.. However, whether or not you would like to redirect the clients to CPP is a different story altogether. If you do not configure CPP, if all the configurations are pushed from SCCM or some other way to the client machines, an admin should be doing the same manually every time to make any changes.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:18:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Surendra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-12T08:18:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AnyConnect client provisioning policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3957037#M455735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it mandatory to configure client provisioning policy?&lt;BR /&gt;Could it be not able to process and complete posture without it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 07:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3957037#M455735</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-12T07:38:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AnyConnect client provisioning policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3957051#M455738</link>
      <description>It is mandatory to configure client provisioning policy and portal irrespective of whether or not you use redirect or redirect less posture since it is required to push any updates to the posture profile/AnyConnect updates etc.. However, whether or not you would like to redirect the clients to CPP is a different story altogether. If you do not configure CPP, if all the configurations are pushed from SCCM or some other way to the client machines, an admin should be doing the same manually every time to make any changes.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:18:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3957051#M455738</guid>
      <dc:creator>Surendra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-12T08:18:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AnyConnect client provisioning policy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3958395#M455742</link>
      <description>Yes, understood, so it is something that has been built into code and cannot be that easily customised? Correct?&lt;BR /&gt;But, even if then there is a requirement from the client to hide this somehow? Then do we need to get Cisco BU into this one?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/anyconnect-client-provisioning-policy/m-p/3958395#M455742</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgaikwad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-14T06:18:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

