<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bug in OpenSSL; OCSP-responder in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/bug-in-openssl-ocsp-responder/m-p/3947986#M456226</link>
    <description>Please make sure you log a tac case with a bug id (and reference here) so they can get this to engineering and they will fix accordingly, this is not TAC and to discuss future fixes unforutunately.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-25T09:09:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bug in OpenSSL; OCSP-responder</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/bug-in-openssl-ocsp-responder/m-p/3947981#M456225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We found out that the OCSP-responder for our local customer PKI in the ISE did not work due to a bug in the OpenSSL version used by ISE. Because the OpenSSL version used does not include a Host-header, the Windows 2016-based OCSP server responds with a 302 status code and an invalid redirect instead of an OCSP response. We finally fixed this on the load balancer by injecting a Host header with the correct value in the absence of a Host header for an OCSP request. It concerns the following bug in OpenSSL: &lt;A href="https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/1986" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/1986&lt;/A&gt;. The bug is 'fixed' in OpenSSL 1.0.2 by adding information about it in the documentation. From version 1.1.0 an actual fix has been implemented with the OCSP client sending a Host-header in the request. Is Cisco planning to upgrade OpenSSL to a newer version any time soon? I didn't find anything about this bug, but there are certainly more customers with similar problems.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/bug-in-openssl-ocsp-responder/m-p/3947981#M456225</guid>
      <dc:creator>dirksmit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-25T08:58:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bug in OpenSSL; OCSP-responder</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/bug-in-openssl-ocsp-responder/m-p/3947986#M456226</link>
      <description>Please make sure you log a tac case with a bug id (and reference here) so they can get this to engineering and they will fix accordingly, this is not TAC and to discuss future fixes unforutunately.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/bug-in-openssl-ocsp-responder/m-p/3947986#M456226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-25T09:09:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

