<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Do we need Posturing for Implementing Dot1x and MAB? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914361#M457453</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi gents (and gals) in our community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need Posturing for Implementing Dot1x and MAB, or is it a requirement for implementing wired ise? I'm initially planning to follow the recommended phase from Monitoring, Low-Impact, to Closed mode. Currently my ISE 2.4 don't have the License for Posture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 02:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>techmgr.aballesteros</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-27T02:17:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Do we need Posturing for Implementing Dot1x and MAB?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914361#M457453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi gents (and gals) in our community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need Posturing for Implementing Dot1x and MAB, or is it a requirement for implementing wired ise? I'm initially planning to follow the recommended phase from Monitoring, Low-Impact, to Closed mode. Currently my ISE 2.4 don't have the License for Posture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 02:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914361#M457453</guid>
      <dc:creator>techmgr.aballesteros</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-27T02:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do we need Posturing for Implementing Dot1x and MAB?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914371#M457454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1853"&gt;@techmgr.aballesteros&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Posturing is not required for 802.1X or MAB.&amp;nbsp; It's an additional service that ISE can provide if you want to check the security posture of the endpoint that is trying to gain network access.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All you need is Base licensing for 802.1X and MAB - AS LONG AS you don't build any Authorization Policies that include advanced features like Profiling and Posturing, etc.&amp;nbsp; Simple stuff like AD look ups only need Base.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 02:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914371#M457454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-27T02:59:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do we need Posturing for Implementing Dot1x and MAB?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914998#M457456</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/158532"&gt;@Arne Bier&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks for verifying! That'll help me move forward and finish my planning checklist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/do-we-need-posturing-for-implementing-dot1x-and-mab/m-p/3914998#M457456</guid>
      <dc:creator>techmgr.aballesteros</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-27T21:31:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

