https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-design/m-p/3866381#M472532 <P>Hi friends.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>We want to design the Cisco ISE deployment for the network with the 1000 Clients. (only radius not tacacs).</P><P>the node are only wire and there is no wireless node.</P><P>which VM deployment size should we use? and should use the distributed design for 1000 node or standalone?</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Best Regards</P> Sun, 02 Jun 2019 09:39:17 GMT atiye.bigdeli 2019-06-02T09:39:17Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-design/m-p/3866381#M472532 <P>Hi friends.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>We want to design the Cisco ISE deployment for the network with the 1000 Clients. (only radius not tacacs).</P><P>the node are only wire and there is no wireless node.</P><P>which VM deployment size should we use? and should use the distributed design for 1000 node or standalone?</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Best Regards</P> Sun, 02 Jun 2019 09:39:17 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-design/m-p/3866381#M472532 atiye.bigdeli 2019-06-02T09:39:17Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-design/m-p/3866443#M472533 You're well within the endpoint count for a small standalone deployment. Either 3515 or 3615 templates depending on the version you want to go with, 2.4 or 2.6. I would suggest two small nodes based on the mentioned templates to ensure HA. <BR /><BR />You can find more details on the performance and scale page. <BR /><A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-performance-amp-scale/ta-p/3642148" target="_blank">https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-performance-amp-scale/ta-p/3642148</A> Sun, 02 Jun 2019 13:49:50 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-design/m-p/3866443#M472533 Damien Miller 2019-06-02T13:49:50Z