<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pxGrid Scalability in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852369#M473293</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I have seen that document as well. My original question was "Are the number of subscribers the only measurable to consider in sizing a pxGrid deployment?"&amp;nbsp; If I have 400,000 users (across 4 3695 PSN), and three subscribers (Firepower, Stealthwatch and DXL).&amp;nbsp; We only a small amount of subscribers but a large number of users do I just care about the number of subscribers connecting to the pxGRid node?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 13:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scamarda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-08T13:26:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pxGrid Scalability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852257#M473291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the Performance and Scale document as well as the individual ISE version documentation, the only pxGrid scale measurement is the amount of subscribers a node supports (node size and deployment method).&amp;nbsp; I interpret a pxGrid subscriber to be an ISE Node, Stealthwatch, Firepower, Infoblox, DXL etc.&amp;nbsp; Should I be concerned about query or publish rates with a large number of Active and Passive authentications?&amp;nbsp; Will the numbers change with pxGrid v2 and ISE becoming a subscriber?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 11:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852257#M473291</guid>
      <dc:creator>scamarda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-08T11:29:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid Scalability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852291#M473292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please verify this slides&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://cs.co/BRKSEC-3432" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://cs.co/BRKSEC-3432&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maximum dedicated pxGrid node is 4 &amp;amp; maximum subscribers per pxGrid node are 200.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 12:20:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852291#M473292</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aravind Ravichandran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-08T12:20:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid Scalability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852369#M473293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I have seen that document as well. My original question was "Are the number of subscribers the only measurable to consider in sizing a pxGrid deployment?"&amp;nbsp; If I have 400,000 users (across 4 3695 PSN), and three subscribers (Firepower, Stealthwatch and DXL).&amp;nbsp; We only a small amount of subscribers but a large number of users do I just care about the number of subscribers connecting to the pxGRid node?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 13:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852369#M473293</guid>
      <dc:creator>scamarda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-08T13:26:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid Scalability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852380#M473294</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, only subscribers have to be considered for pxgrid scaling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have only 3 subscribers I guess you can run pxgrid on the PAN node itself but not tested on this one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 13:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3852380#M473294</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aravind Ravichandran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-08T13:44:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pxGrid Scalability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3859427#M473295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Sam,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Stealthwatch, Firepower, McAfee DXL, all use pxGrid 1.0. &amp;nbsp;The customer should really have pxGrid dedicated nodes. Since this is pxGrid 1.0, you can only have 2 pxGrid nodes per ISE deployment. &amp;nbsp;This would be an active/standby scenario.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please email me directly, i would like to get more information on your customer's deployment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;jeppich@cisco.com&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 14:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/pxgrid-scalability/m-p/3859427#M473295</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeppich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-20T14:40:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

