<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Switch Radius-based device authentication in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829798#M474306</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. Radius authentication whether 802.1x or AAA takes up a Base license while that session is in progress.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nadav</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-01T09:44:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switch Radius-based device authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829794#M474305</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am working on a Cisco ISE opportunity.&amp;nbsp; Our customer is having non-Cisco switches, which do not support TACACS+ authentication. A&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;lternatively, we have proposed Radius-based device authentication.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;I just wanted to confirm that this&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Radius-based device authentication for these switches will consume Base&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;license via concurrent sessions or not?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In other words, do I have to consider these switches in my estimate for ISE Base licence, if our customer decides to do Radius-based device authentication for these switches?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance for your support.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829794#M474305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karim Bellassoued</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T09:38:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switch Radius-based device authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829798#M474306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. Radius authentication whether 802.1x or AAA takes up a Base license while that session is in progress.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829798#M474306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nadav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T09:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switch Radius-based device authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829810#M474307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Nadav.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:09:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/switch-radius-based-device-authentication/m-p/3829810#M474307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karim Bellassoued</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T10:09:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

