<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ISE TACACS Query in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3818987#M474817</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes just sent both to 15 and do command authorization to grant the users what access they need.&amp;nbsp; I believe the default priv. level is the initial priv level the user is put in.&amp;nbsp; If the user chooses to elevate (with the enable command as an example) the max priv value is checked to see if that is allowed.&amp;nbsp; I don't use the concept of priv level any more and everyone gets 15 from the start.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-13T17:27:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE TACACS Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3818949#M474814</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have query regarding ISE TACACS device admin configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. what is the difference between "Default Priv" and "Max priv" levels in shell profile.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. for a CU deployment, just to make the easy deployment, can we restrict only on basis of command sets for different users access group and configure the single shell profile with static 15/15 value for "Default Priv" and "Max priv" levels.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am more in favour of security/restriction over ease ability if defining the different shell profiles can make difference.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3818949#M474814</guid>
      <dc:creator>sondevi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-13T16:38:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE TACACS Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3818987#M474817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes just sent both to 15 and do command authorization to grant the users what access they need.&amp;nbsp; I believe the default priv. level is the initial priv level the user is put in.&amp;nbsp; If the user chooses to elevate (with the enable command as an example) the max priv value is checked to see if that is allowed.&amp;nbsp; I don't use the concept of priv level any more and everyone gets 15 from the start.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3818987#M474817</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-13T17:27:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE TACACS Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3819287#M474820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Paul for quick reply. same thought.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 06:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-tacacs-query/m-p/3819287#M474820</guid>
      <dc:creator>sondevi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-14T06:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

