<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE Small Deployment Server Size in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3768083#M486787</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do the two servers in a small deployment have to be the same size?&amp;nbsp; I have a customer who is setting up a lab and they have one small VM and one medium VM license, can they build a small deployment with VMs that aren't sized the same?&amp;nbsp; Since it's a lab, we don't expect much load at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I understand that they could just build two small servers and have them be identical, and that's my fall-back recommendation, but figured I would reach out to the community to see if there is a technical limitation that would prevent the use of a small and medium server in a cluster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>matthen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-21T21:40:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Small Deployment Server Size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3768083#M486787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do the two servers in a small deployment have to be the same size?&amp;nbsp; I have a customer who is setting up a lab and they have one small VM and one medium VM license, can they build a small deployment with VMs that aren't sized the same?&amp;nbsp; Since it's a lab, we don't expect much load at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I understand that they could just build two small servers and have them be identical, and that's my fall-back recommendation, but figured I would reach out to the community to see if there is a technical limitation that would prevent the use of a small and medium server in a cluster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3768083#M486787</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-21T21:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Small Deployment Server Size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3768086#M486790</link>
      <description>It will work fine there are no restrictions for it to work &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Of course sizing on the small box should always support your production endpoints&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3768086#M486790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-21T21:48:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Small Deployment Server Size</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3771069#M486793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jason!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 18:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-small-deployment-server-size/m-p/3771069#M486793</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-01T18:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

