<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cluster ISE between appliance and VM in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3750298#M487950</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The message is that you can deploy the ISE software on any hypervisor that the software will run on (VMWare, HyperV, KVM) - once ISE is running on a virtualised platform, then the software doesn't behave any differently to how it behaves on a physical server appliance (SNS-3xxx).&amp;nbsp; That means you can register a "HyperV ISE" node to a PAN running on a SNS-3xxx.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The concept of cluster is not technically correct with ISE.&amp;nbsp; I think historically the term was cube (&lt;EM&gt;"ise cube"&lt;/EM&gt;).&amp;nbsp; The only advice given in this hybrid combination is to make the VM have the equivalent CPU/MEM/Disk as the physical appliance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only real difference you will face with ISE running on VM is that you will need a license for this.&amp;nbsp; SNS-3xxx does not need such a license.&amp;nbsp; All other licenses are the same.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-21T10:00:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster ISE between appliance and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3749901#M487947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;hello, I'm almost sure, but I would like to know if there is an opportunity to create a cluster (Admin, Mnt) between a 3595 Appliance and a Hyper-V VM?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you in advance for your feedback.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:04:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3749901#M487947</guid>
      <dc:creator>marvin16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T11:04:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster ISE between appliance and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3749933#M487948</link>
      <description>Google search shows several conversations in community like this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.google.com/search?q=ise%20mix%20hardware%20vm" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.google.com/search?q=ise%20mix%20hardware%20vm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; Example&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/policy-and-access/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/td-p/3077622" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/policy-and-access/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/td-p/3077622&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3749933#M487948</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T12:29:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster ISE between appliance and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3749940#M487949</link>
      <description>I did not understand the solution below&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/policy-and-access/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/td-p/3077622" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/policy-and-access/ise-vm-and-ise-physical-appliance-in-distributed-deployment/td-p/3077622&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But if you validate this possibility, i just need to thank you &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;bg</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3749940#M487949</guid>
      <dc:creator>marvin16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T12:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster ISE between appliance and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3750298#M487950</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The message is that you can deploy the ISE software on any hypervisor that the software will run on (VMWare, HyperV, KVM) - once ISE is running on a virtualised platform, then the software doesn't behave any differently to how it behaves on a physical server appliance (SNS-3xxx).&amp;nbsp; That means you can register a "HyperV ISE" node to a PAN running on a SNS-3xxx.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The concept of cluster is not technically correct with ISE.&amp;nbsp; I think historically the term was cube (&lt;EM&gt;"ise cube"&lt;/EM&gt;).&amp;nbsp; The only advice given in this hybrid combination is to make the VM have the equivalent CPU/MEM/Disk as the physical appliance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only real difference you will face with ISE running on VM is that you will need a license for this.&amp;nbsp; SNS-3xxx does not need such a license.&amp;nbsp; All other licenses are the same.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3750298#M487950</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-21T10:00:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster ISE between appliance and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3750558#M487951</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank's for your precious help !! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 08:53:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cluster-ise-between-appliance-and-vm/m-p/3750558#M487951</guid>
      <dc:creator>marvin16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-21T08:53:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

