<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SGACL state-less / stateful? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sgacl-state-less-stateful/m-p/3513358#M490702</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to my knowledge, SGACLs are normally statless, which means that I have to explictly allow return traffic in cases where SGACLs are used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any devices (besides ASA/FTD) which are stateful when using SGACLs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rmueller@cisco.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:44:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SGACL state-less / stateful?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sgacl-state-less-stateful/m-p/3513358#M490702</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to my knowledge, SGACLs are normally statless, which means that I have to explictly allow return traffic in cases where SGACLs are used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any devices (besides ASA/FTD) which are stateful when using SGACLs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sgacl-state-less-stateful/m-p/3513358#M490702</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmueller@cisco.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:44:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SGACL state-less / stateful?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sgacl-state-less-stateful/m-p/3513359#M490711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Roland,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all devices downloading SGACLs from ISE are stateless (switches, routers, AP's via WLC).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you say, firewalls offer stateful inspection but they use SGFW rules, they don't download SGACLs from ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Routers can offer stateful operation while using SGT's in zone based firewall setup but again, SGACLs are not downloaded for this function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 15:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sgacl-state-less-stateful/m-p/3513359#M490711</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeaves@cisco.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-29T15:22:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

