<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment/m-p/3702287#M494006</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It difficult to say as it is not a tested &amp;amp; validated configuration. Please refer to the following Cisco Live presentation for ISE scale guidance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/global/on-demand-library/?search.event=ciscoliveus2018&amp;amp;search=ISE#/session/1511296160606001Af1J" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/global/on-demand-library/?search.event=ciscoliveus2018&amp;amp;search=ISE#/session/1511296160606001Af1J&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kvenkata1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-06T16:38:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment/m-p/3701725#M494005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who has 8 PSN Nodes running along with the PAN and MNT running on the same appliance!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The CVD however mentions that there should only be 5 PSNs in the deployment&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are the negative impacts of having 8 PSNs in this scenario&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Impact in terms of perf degradation, latency issues etc!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 04:24:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment/m-p/3701725#M494005</guid>
      <dc:creator>nupur jain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-06T04:24:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment/m-p/3702287#M494006</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It difficult to say as it is not a tested &amp;amp; validated configuration. Please refer to the following Cisco Live presentation for ISE scale guidance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ciscolive.com/global/on-demand-library/?search.event=ciscoliveus2018&amp;amp;search=ISE#/session/1511296160606001Af1J" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ciscolive.com/global/on-demand-library/?search.event=ciscoliveus2018&amp;amp;search=ISE#/session/1511296160606001Af1J&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment/m-p/3702287#M494006</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvenkata1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-06T16:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

