<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723747#M495282</link>
    <description>If its different networks then open a tac case&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:49:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723699#M495275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Working on Brocade switch using Auth VLAN for Posture flow. Auth VLAN approach works fine in single PSN. How do we scale to multiple PSN using Auth VLAN?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When try to configure DHCP scope on both PSN1 and PSN2 using same IP segment but IP address assignment is unique there is an error.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="dhcp configure existing.png" style="width: 896px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20146iEC8CD368D8B1B839/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="dhcp configure existing.png" alt="dhcp configure existing.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="dhcp configure new.png" style="width: 896px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20147iFF806323D8FE424E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="dhcp configure new.png" alt="dhcp configure new.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Error during saving DHCP scope. Any idea?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wing Churn&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="error dhcp.png" style="width: 896px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20148i14621AE91B63E72B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="error dhcp.png" alt="error dhcp.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723699#M495275</guid>
      <dc:creator>wileong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:11:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723709#M495276</link>
      <description>Its not supported to run same subnet on different PSNs. I assume for redundancy you’re doing this? I have heard this in the past would recommend you reach out via account team for a feature request&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:18:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723709#M495276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:18:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723730#M495277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jason,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Understood on the redundancy is not available today. How about the error of creating none overlapping DHCP scope for the third screenshot i provided? The second scope i am creating is not overlapping with existing created scope, do we have any known bug on this. By the way, we are running ISE 2.2p9&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wing Churn&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:32:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723730#M495277</guid>
      <dc:creator>wileong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:32:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723733#M495278</link>
      <description>It’s the same subnet correct? Regardles of nonverlapping status its not supported&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723733#M495278</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723737#M495279</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry, my attached image might be confusing but the DHCP scope is not overlapped.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:40:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723737#M495279</guid>
      <dc:creator>wileong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:40:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723740#M495280</link>
      <description>It’s the same subnet. The network ID is the same therefore it won’t work. It doesn’t matter if you split the scope where 1 PSN serves part of the scope and the other part on another PSN (this works in Microsoft DHCP server but not on ISE design).&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723740#M495280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723742#M495281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you are still misunderstood. Ignore those images, i am creating 2 totally different subnets and still get this error. Do we have any known issue around DHCP scope? If not, i will get partner to raise a TAC case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723742#M495281</guid>
      <dc:creator>wileong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auth VLAN on third party switch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723747#M495282</link>
      <description>If its different networks then open a tac case&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/auth-vlan-on-third-party-switch/m-p/3723747#M495282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T15:49:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

