<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there a TAC/Cisco supported deployment running ISE 2.4 virtual machines with a Small VM license (R-ISE-VMS-K9)? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466367#M496179</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com//u1/38995"&gt;hslai&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're currently in the grace period for licensing (~40days go to).&amp;nbsp; Can you provide an ETA for when this will be fixed?&amp;nbsp; What are our options if this won't be resolved prior to our license expiring?&amp;nbsp; We're looking to go-live with the service at the end of July and I'm trying to assess our options/impact.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS - I can't see &lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d; font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"&gt;CSCvk09597&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Would it be helpful for me to have TAC link my case to it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>markgully</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-13T16:31:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a TAC/Cisco supported deployment running ISE 2.4 virtual machines with a Small VM license (R-ISE-VMS-K9)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466365#M496177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a TAC/Cisco supported deployment running ISE 2.4 virtual machines with a Small VM license (R-ISE-VMS-K9)?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I deploy VMs and match the hardware specs of a sns3515 we match a Large VM license.&amp;nbsp; If I remove virtual CPUs to 6 to match the specs of a small VM license, ISE detects the profile as “ucsSmall”, which I’ve been told is not supported for ISE 2.4.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Background – &lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL style="list-style-type: disc;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We have a new virtual ISE 2.4 deployment based off the “ISE-2.4.0.xxx-virtual-SNS3515-Small-200GBHD-16GBRAM-12CPU.ova”.&amp;nbsp; We have ISE Virtual Machine Small licenses (R-ISE-VMS-K9), but when the new VMs are connected to smart licensing we’re getting the error that we need ISE Virtual Machine &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Large&lt;/SPAN&gt; licenses.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;My understanding is that the virtual appliance hardware specs must match the physical appliance specs to be supported (per various Cisco Live sessions including BRKSEC-3697).&amp;nbsp; The OVA deployment fulfills this requirement and “show tech” lists the ISE profile as “sns3515”.&amp;nbsp; This is all good, but we’re being pressed for Large VM licenses.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If I drop the virtual CPU count to meet the small VM license specs the ISE profile shows “ucsSmall”, which I don’t believe supports ISE 2.4.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Note, I’ve already identified that this is hitting the bug CSCvj86638…. I’m looking past that as we can deploy via ISO if there’s a supported option.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:02:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466365#M496177</guid>
      <dc:creator>markgully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-13T16:02:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a TAC/Cisco supported deployment running ISE 2.4 virtual machines with a Small VM license (R-ISE-VMS-K9)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466366#M496178</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are addressing the VM licensing issue with CSCvk09597, currently planned for ISE 2.4 Patch 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus, I would &lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&lt;/STRONG&gt; recommend reducing CPU or RAM especially if the deployment needing the additional resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466366#M496178</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-13T16:11:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a TAC/Cisco supported deployment running ISE 2.4 virtual machines with a Small VM license (R-ISE-VMS-K9)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466367#M496179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com//u1/38995"&gt;hslai&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're currently in the grace period for licensing (~40days go to).&amp;nbsp; Can you provide an ETA for when this will be fixed?&amp;nbsp; What are our options if this won't be resolved prior to our license expiring?&amp;nbsp; We're looking to go-live with the service at the end of July and I'm trying to assess our options/impact.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS - I can't see &lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d; font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"&gt;CSCvk09597&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Would it be helpful for me to have TAC link my case to it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466367#M496179</guid>
      <dc:creator>markgully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-13T16:31:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a TAC/Cisco supported deployment running ISE 2.4 virtual machines with a Small VM license (R-ISE-VMS-K9)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466368#M496180</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other than the nagging alarms, ISE 2.4 is not currently enforcing VM licenses, so it's ok to ignore them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's too early to know a good approximate CCO date for Patch 3 but we expect it in 2 ~ 3 months. If it not acceptable to you or your management, then please ask TAC to request a hot patch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will discuss with our team about publishing info on &lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d; font-family: arial; font-size: 12px;"&gt;CSCvk09597&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/is-there-a-tac-cisco-supported-deployment-running-ise-2-4/m-p/3466368#M496180</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-13T17:15:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

