<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Guest Portal - SMS Notification flow in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556886#M496304</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks Craig. will test in the lab today. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rdediana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-12T18:36:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Guest Portal - SMS Notification flow</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556883#M496300</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a couple questions regarding ISE SMS notification service, and, the traffic flows required to complete the transactions within a distributed deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;The design includes separate PAN and PSN nodes with respective HA primary / secondary roles running version 2.3 patch2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Questions&lt;/STRONG&gt;: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;1. Once the SMS gateway is configured, which node is &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;responsible&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; for initiating and completing the SMS transaction? PAN or PSN?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;2. if multiple interfaces are configured on the respective ISE node, it is possible to configure an ip route (cli) to influence the selection of ISE node egress interface used to communicate with the SMS provider?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;thanks. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Regan&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 02:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556883#M496300</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdediana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T02:22:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Guest Portal - SMS Notification flow</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556884#M496302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will respond after I am able to locate the answer internally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:14:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556884#M496302</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvenkata1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T16:14:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Guest Portal - SMS Notification flow</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556885#M496303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be originated from PSN.&amp;nbsp; Are you not seeing this behavior?&amp;nbsp; You can verify by taking TCPDUMP off PSN interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the use of a static route can be used to influence the exit interface for external communications.&amp;nbsp; Some management traffic like AD or inter-node communications is restricted to GE0, but quick test with TCPDUMP (or check source IP of traffic) could verify if that is the case for email/sms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:11:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556885#M496303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-11T23:11:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Guest Portal - SMS Notification flow</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556886#M496304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks Craig. will test in the lab today. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-guest-portal-sms-notification-flow/m-p/3556886#M496304</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdediana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-12T18:36:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

