<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE enable PIC feature in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515576#M496645</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are going to enabled PIC feature and pxgrid feature on our production ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best practice of deployment PIC feature and pxgrid ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need dedicated PSN for PIC features? And do we need dedicated nodes for pxgrid?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>csco11552159</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-27T13:58:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE enable PIC feature</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515576#M496645</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are going to enabled PIC feature and pxgrid feature on our production ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best practice of deployment PIC feature and pxgrid ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need dedicated PSN for PIC features? And do we need dedicated nodes for pxgrid?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515576#M496645</guid>
      <dc:creator>csco11552159</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-27T13:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE enable PIC feature</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515577#M496647</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's best practice to dedicate a node to the pxGrid persona.&amp;nbsp; PassiveID can be run on an existing PSN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515577#M496647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy Abbott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-27T14:01:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE enable PIC feature</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515578#M496649</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you. &lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume the PSN nodes to enable PIC should be 2 for redundant, right? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-enable-pic-feature/m-p/3515578#M496649</guid>
      <dc:creator>csco11552159</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-27T14:54:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

