<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE patches - Safe to remove old ones? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856413#M496974</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been meaning to ask this question for some time now - glad someone beat me to it.&amp;nbsp; I have been deleting the files from the CLI of the nodes - that's as far as you can go.&amp;nbsp; There is no other user accessible "cleanup" to remove old stuff.&amp;nbsp; Rebuilding a PAN is the only way I know to get rid of legacy patches.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have poked around the Linux filesystem though and noticed that the old patch files are lying around.&amp;nbsp; Removing them makes a VM a lot smaller (after you compress the VM with vm-tools).&amp;nbsp; I am &lt;STRONG&gt;not advocating this for production systems&lt;/STRONG&gt; - but for labs where SSD is scarce, I remove all the junk lying around (including upgrade files, patch files and old logs).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I like my house tidy &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 02:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-15T02:30:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE patches - Safe to remove old ones?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3855995#M496941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it recommended to remove old ISE patches? Cisco states that,&lt;SPAN&gt;"Patches are cumulative such that any patch version also includes all fixes delivered in the preceding patch versions." &lt;/SPAN&gt;I've just installed Patch 8 for 2.4 and would like to remove the old Patch 5 if possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="version.jpeg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36683i49A95177E0B89E32/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="version.jpeg" alt="version.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3855995#M496941</guid>
      <dc:creator>innovative_elephant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T19:05:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE patches - Safe to remove old ones?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856029#M496953</link>
      <description>In order to do this you would have to remove patch 8, then remove patch 5, then install patch 8 again.  It's not a process I would recommend unless there is a specific need.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 14:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856029#M496953</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T14:49:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE patches - Safe to remove old ones?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856032#M496968</link>
      <description>Just leave them alone, there is not harm, patch 8 would have overwrote anything else regardless so there is no impact in the system&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 14:51:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856032#M496968</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T14:51:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE patches - Safe to remove old ones?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856413#M496974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been meaning to ask this question for some time now - glad someone beat me to it.&amp;nbsp; I have been deleting the files from the CLI of the nodes - that's as far as you can go.&amp;nbsp; There is no other user accessible "cleanup" to remove old stuff.&amp;nbsp; Rebuilding a PAN is the only way I know to get rid of legacy patches.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have poked around the Linux filesystem though and noticed that the old patch files are lying around.&amp;nbsp; Removing them makes a VM a lot smaller (after you compress the VM with vm-tools).&amp;nbsp; I am &lt;STRONG&gt;not advocating this for production systems&lt;/STRONG&gt; - but for labs where SSD is scarce, I remove all the junk lying around (including upgrade files, patch files and old logs).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I like my house tidy &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 02:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-patches-safe-to-remove-old-ones/m-p/3856413#M496974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T02:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

