<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE2.4 incorrect VM licensing in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419532#M508951</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;customer did the fresh install using ISE2.4 ISO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setup is&amp;nbsp; 64GB RAM, 8 cores.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, ISE asking for &lt;STRONG&gt;Large VM&lt;/STRONG&gt; license instead of Medium. Can see “out of compliance” error on licensing page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;We changed the cores to 6, “out of compliance” moved to &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Small&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;VM &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;keeping RAM unchanged&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;The situation is like it never goes to Medium VM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;VM reservation :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CPU : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Memory : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does VM reservation impact the licensing. Is it some sort of known behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gagandeep Singh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gagandeep Singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-19T22:12:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE2.4 incorrect VM licensing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419532#M508951</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;customer did the fresh install using ISE2.4 ISO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setup is&amp;nbsp; 64GB RAM, 8 cores.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, ISE asking for &lt;STRONG&gt;Large VM&lt;/STRONG&gt; license instead of Medium. Can see “out of compliance” error on licensing page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;We changed the cores to 6, “out of compliance” moved to &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Small&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;VM &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;keeping RAM unchanged&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;The situation is like it never goes to Medium VM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;VM reservation :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CPU : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Memory : Disabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does VM reservation impact the licensing. Is it some sort of known behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gagandeep Singh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419532#M508951</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gagandeep Singh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-19T22:12:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE2.4 incorrect VM licensing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419533#M508952</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please try recreating it and log a bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419533#M508952</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-19T22:26:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE2.4 incorrect VM licensing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419534#M508953</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, per the CPU allocation bug filed 6 or 8 are no longer the correct CPUs you should be allocating.&amp;nbsp; 12 CPUs is a 3515 and 16 CPUs is 3595.&amp;nbsp; If you use the new OVAs this is how you will see them structured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise2-4-incorrect-vm-licensing/m-p/3419534#M508953</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-20T20:38:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

