<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: feature parity between posture agent and agentless in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459517#M509480</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Web agent is only for windows clients.&amp;nbsp; We introduced a temporal agent that replaces the Web agent in ISE 2.3 that does support OS X.&amp;nbsp; The only unsupported condition for OS X with the temporal agent is daemon and user agent checks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 15:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy Abbott</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-30T15:54:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>feature parity between posture agent and agentless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459515#M509475</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer need the comparison between posture agent and agentless. Would you please help provide this information ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 14:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459515#M509475</guid>
      <dc:creator>lean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-30T14:22:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feature parity between posture agent and agentless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459516#M509477</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just found this information:&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/message/253961"&gt;limitations of using web nac agent&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But how about web agent for Mac ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 14:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459516#M509477</guid>
      <dc:creator>lean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-30T14:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feature parity between posture agent and agentless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459517#M509480</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Web agent is only for windows clients.&amp;nbsp; We introduced a temporal agent that replaces the Web agent in ISE 2.3 that does support OS X.&amp;nbsp; The only unsupported condition for OS X with the temporal agent is daemon and user agent checks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 15:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459517#M509480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy Abbott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-30T15:54:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feature parity between posture agent and agentless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459518#M509482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="postureslide.jpg" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/fusion/117298_postureslide.jpg" style="height: 338px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 22:47:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459518#M509482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-30T22:47:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: feature parity between posture agent and agentless</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459519#M509485</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for your help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 03:29:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/feature-parity-between-posture-agent-and-agentless/m-p/3459519#M509485</guid>
      <dc:creator>lean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-31T03:29:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

