<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical(3595) appliance? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539311#M510928</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Greg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specific info is below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Small Network Deployments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ISE server 1 ( Virtual)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; primary PAN, primary MnT, active pxGrid and PSN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ISE server 2 ( SNS3595)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; secondary PAN, secondary MnT, standby pxGrid and PSN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Virtual appliance is ISE-2.2.0.470-virtual-1.2TB-SNS3595.ova&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Physical appliance is SNS3595 and same version of Virtual&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 3rd party loadbalancer is not used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Plus license is used for pxGrid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-MAB only. dot1x is not used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yusuke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yuogawa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-10T07:39:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical(3595) appliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539309#M510926</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical appliance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though I could find answer that 3495 is no problem, I would like to know the case of ISE 3595 for confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yusuke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539309#M510926</guid>
      <dc:creator>yuogawa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-10T05:59:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical(3595) appliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539310#M510927</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yusuke-san,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please be more specific about what type of redundancy you're asking about? There's a lot of redundancy built into the architecture of an ISE deployment (Primary/Secondary PAN and MnT), redundancy of multiple PSNs using 3rd party load balancers, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539310#M510927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-10T07:17:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical(3595) appliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539311#M510928</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Greg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specific info is below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Small Network Deployments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ISE server 1 ( Virtual)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; primary PAN, primary MnT, active pxGrid and PSN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ISE server 2 ( SNS3595)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; secondary PAN, secondary MnT, standby pxGrid and PSN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Virtual appliance is ISE-2.2.0.470-virtual-1.2TB-SNS3595.ova&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Physical appliance is SNS3595 and same version of Virtual&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 3rd party loadbalancer is not used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Plus license is used for pxGrid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-MAB only. dot1x is not used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yusuke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539311#M510928</guid>
      <dc:creator>yuogawa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-10T07:39:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical(3595) appliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539312#M510930</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, mixing physical and virtual appliances in the same ISE cluster is supported. Just make sure the virtual appliance is built with the same specs as the physical 3595, including reservations for CPU and Memory as per the Install Guide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-2/install_guide/b_ise_InstallationGuide22/b_ise_InstallationGuide22_chapter_01.html#vmwarevmrequirements" title="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-2/install_guide/b_ise_InstallationGuide22/b_ise_InstallationGuide22_chapter_01.html#vmwarevmrequirements"&gt;Cisco Identity Services Engine Installation Guide, Release 2.2 - System Requirements [Cisco Identity Services Engine] -…&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539312#M510930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-10T07:51:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does ISE support redundancy of Virtual and Physical(3595) appliance?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539313#M510934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="answer"&gt;Thank you for your quick and polite response.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="answer"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="answer"&gt;Yusuke&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:57:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-redundancy-of-virtual-and-physical-3595/m-p/3539313#M510934</guid>
      <dc:creator>yuogawa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-10T07:57:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

