<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SDA ISE License question in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587557#M511420</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Got it, thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hai Cheng Xu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-22T02:52:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDA ISE License question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587554#M511417</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; My customer is interesting SDA solution ,but they don't want to deploy 802.1X for dynamic user SGT assigment at this moment. If they use static mapping for VLAN ID with SGT,Will this action consume ISE user license ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 01:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587554#M511417</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hai Cheng Xu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T01:24:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA ISE License question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587555#M511418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe this question is already being asked internally?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are you asking here? Please continue asking the sda team as it sounds like you’re going to bypass ISE altogether then it’s not an ISE question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please explain your use case there&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 01:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587555#M511418</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T01:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA ISE License question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587556#M511419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They will still need ISE for Group Based Policies today even if they opt to assign SGTs manually to the endpoints. For TrustSec functionality on ISE, a minimum 100 Base license would suffice. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587556#M511419</guid>
      <dc:creator>hariholla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T16:57:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA ISE License question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587557#M511420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Got it, thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/sda-ise-license-question/m-p/3587557#M511420</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hai Cheng Xu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T02:52:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

