<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 600 GB for VM ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512710#M517598</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, supported by TAC. In case CU deployments running into issues with the sub-optimal settings, CU will be asked to adhere to the recommendations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As ISE currently not supporting disk resizing, that would mean to install a new M&amp;amp;T node with bigger disk allocations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:57:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-12T17:57:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>600 GB for VM ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512706#M517587</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;"&gt;I have a Customer that wants to know, why 600 GB for VM ISE, does anyone know what we use this space for?, the customer need justify it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512706#M517587</guid>
      <dc:creator>emzarago</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T01:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 600 GB for VM ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512707#M517589</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is recommended that any node running MnT persona should have a minimum of 600GB for the logs,debugs..etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Take a look at this doc regarding performance and Scale.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-68347"&gt;ISE Performance &amp;amp;amp; Scale&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512707#M517589</guid>
      <dc:creator>ldanny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T09:05:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 600 GB for VM ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512708#M517591</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To add to Danny's response, the reason is primarily data retention.&amp;nbsp; MnT is the logging node--it stores all RADIUS/TACACS+ events.&amp;nbsp; Ability to generate reports on historical events is driven by disk capacity.&amp;nbsp; The install guide offers some general data points on retention based on allocated disk size, and yes, your mileage may vary.&amp;nbsp; Is it possible to deploy with less?&amp;nbsp; Yes, but then you will experience shorter retention and potentially more frequent purging and resource utilization to keep capacity within usable range.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 19:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512708#M517591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T19:22:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 600 GB for VM ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512709#M517596</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chyps thank you for the answer, one more question, the installation is supported for the TAC&amp;nbsp; if the customer installed it with less HDD capacity?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512709#M517596</guid>
      <dc:creator>emzarago</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-12T17:51:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 600 GB for VM ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512710#M517598</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, supported by TAC. In case CU deployments running into issues with the sub-optimal settings, CU will be asked to adhere to the recommendations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As ISE currently not supporting disk resizing, that would mean to install a new M&amp;amp;T node with bigger disk allocations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:57:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/600-gb-for-vm-ise/m-p/3512710#M517598</guid>
      <dc:creator>hslai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-12T17:57:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

