<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Stack with Dot1x in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588926#M517602</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have a customer who wants to create stacks of up to 9 3850s switches, in the past i have had issues with stacks of more that 5 switches with dot1x, Do u know of any recommendation for Dot1x in stacks of 3850s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dirosas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-26T20:55:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stack with Dot1x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588926#M517602</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have a customer who wants to create stacks of up to 9 3850s switches, in the past i have had issues with stacks of more that 5 switches with dot1x, Do u know of any recommendation for Dot1x in stacks of 3850s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588926#M517602</guid>
      <dc:creator>dirosas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-26T20:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stack with Dot1x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588927#M517604</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue you refer to sounds like a problem with the switch software sending RADIUS requests and not ISE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without a specific bug ID it's hard to know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We always recommend testing things in a lab especially if you've had problems with the scenario previously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588927#M517604</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-26T21:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stack with Dot1x</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588928#M517605</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Thanks Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I currently have no issues, in fact this customer doesn't have the stacks created yet, but in the past I have had issues with large stacks and dot1x, i was wondering if there is a limit or recommendation, Testing is on our plan but i was looking for an actual document that could mention that information before the actual testing,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/stack-with-dot1x/m-p/3588928#M517605</guid>
      <dc:creator>dirosas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T19:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

