<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE 2.2 patch 5 and CSCve82240 bug in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569330#M518552</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes that’s correct&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But you’re still running into the bug. Do you have a case to explore why that’s happening?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be looking through the tac to troubleshoot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-17T16:45:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.2 patch 5 and CSCve82240 bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569327#M518549</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;experts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the ISE 2.2 Patch 5 release note, this bug is fixed. However, my customer still hit the same bug when trying out on patch 5 released on mid-Dec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Checking on the bug note, I see that the bug was in version 2.2.0470, fixed in 2.2.0905. We are informed that these two are all the same patch 5 version: &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;"&gt;2.2.0905 is 2.2 Patch 5. 2.2.0470 is the FCS build version.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;"&gt;I am really confused at this point.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569327#M518549</guid>
      <dc:creator>harrzhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T15:10:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.2 patch 5 and CSCve82240 bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569328#M518550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do they have a tac case to investigate and correct discrepancies&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569328#M518550</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T15:31:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.2 patch 5 and CSCve82240 bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569329#M518551</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The TAC engineer is telling us the 470 and 905 are the same code for patch 5.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569329#M518551</guid>
      <dc:creator>harrzhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T16:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.2 patch 5 and CSCve82240 bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569330#M518552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes that’s correct&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But you’re still running into the bug. Do you have a case to explore why that’s happening?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be looking through the tac to troubleshoot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569330#M518552</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T16:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.2 patch 5 and CSCve82240 bug</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569331#M518553</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are many builds culminating in final release.&amp;nbsp; The FCS number of 470 is the last build used for FCS.&amp;nbsp; After FCS, patches are flagged using 90#, where # is the Patch version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, be sure to work with TAC to determine if truly hitting same issue or new issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:25:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-2-patch-5-and-cscve82240-bug/m-p/3569331#M518553</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T17:25:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

