<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Peer ADM Persona on Hardware and VM in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/peer-adm-persona-on-hardware-and-vm/m-p/3493331#M518798</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone successfully deployed, or found documentation on, peering and Primary/Secondary Admin Persona's with one instance on hardware and the second instance running as a virtual machine?&amp;nbsp; I am performing research to determine the viability of migrating from an virtual only environment to a a mixed hardware/VM environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The rule of thumb has been that the Admin/MnT Persona's get the same hardware, or the same virtual machine requirements.&amp;nbsp; But how does that look in a brownfield migration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 19:04:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>spellluck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-05T19:04:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Peer ADM Persona on Hardware and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/peer-adm-persona-on-hardware-and-vm/m-p/3493331#M518798</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone successfully deployed, or found documentation on, peering and Primary/Secondary Admin Persona's with one instance on hardware and the second instance running as a virtual machine?&amp;nbsp; I am performing research to determine the viability of migrating from an virtual only environment to a a mixed hardware/VM environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The rule of thumb has been that the Admin/MnT Persona's get the same hardware, or the same virtual machine requirements.&amp;nbsp; But how does that look in a brownfield migration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 19:04:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/peer-adm-persona-on-hardware-and-vm/m-p/3493331#M518798</guid>
      <dc:creator>spellluck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-05T19:04:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peer ADM Persona on Hardware and VM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/peer-adm-persona-on-hardware-and-vm/m-p/3493332#M518801</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your second instance (VM) allocate (and reserve) the hardware on your host for the ISE VM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If using Cisco SNS-35x5 appliances, use this as a guide:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="VM_Sizing.PNG" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/fusion/114447_VM_Sizing.PNG" style="height: 361px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 20:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/peer-adm-persona-on-hardware-and-vm/m-p/3493332#M518801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie Moreton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-05T20:36:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

