<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does ISE support the SNAT environment using SLBs(Server load balancers)? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-the-snat-environment-using-slbs-server-load/m-p/3456006#M518895</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer asked me weather SNAT using SLB(The customer plans to use F5) support for ISE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They can NOT use CoA(My understand CoA does NOT support SNAT).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer assumes only the function of general RADIUS authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If someone has any information/documents about this, please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Hidehiko&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 01:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hidyano</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-28T01:27:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does ISE support the SNAT environment using SLBs(Server load balancers)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-the-snat-environment-using-slbs-server-load/m-p/3456006#M518895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer asked me weather SNAT using SLB(The customer plans to use F5) support for ISE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They can NOT use CoA(My understand CoA does NOT support SNAT).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer assumes only the function of general RADIUS authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If someone has any information/documents about this, please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Hidehiko&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 01:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-the-snat-environment-using-slbs-server-load/m-p/3456006#M518895</guid>
      <dc:creator>hidyano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-28T01:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does ISE support the SNAT environment using SLBs(Server load balancers)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-the-snat-environment-using-slbs-server-load/m-p/3456007#M518898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Review the &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-64434"&gt;ISE-F5 LB Guide &lt;/A&gt;and also content from BRKSEC-3699 (reference version) @ ciscolive.com.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SNAT for NAD is BAD.&amp;nbsp; SNAT for COA is OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 01:57:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/does-ise-support-the-snat-environment-using-slbs-server-load/m-p/3456007#M518898</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-28T01:57:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

