<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Average ISE AAA+Posture bandwidth consumption per user in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479878#M519561</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear ISE expert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer that can not go for distrubetd deployment because of latency issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He has some remote sites that can have up to 1000 users and is worried about having&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all the users connecting within a short time and affecting bandwidth usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please can you help identify the average bandwidth consumption for ISE AAA with posture and the average time it takes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Tahnks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babacar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bawagne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-23T10:52:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Average ISE AAA+Posture bandwidth consumption per user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479878#M519561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear ISE expert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer that can not go for distrubetd deployment because of latency issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He has some remote sites that can have up to 1000 users and is worried about having&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all the users connecting within a short time and affecting bandwidth usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please can you help identify the average bandwidth consumption for ISE AAA with posture and the average time it takes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Tahnks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babacar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479878#M519561</guid>
      <dc:creator>bawagne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-23T10:52:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Average ISE AAA+Posture bandwidth consumption per user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479879#M519563</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have posted BW/Latency guidance here: &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-64317"&gt;ISE Latency and Bandwidth Calculators&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but specifically call out that the calculator does not cover bandwidth required for RADIUS or other services like Profiling and Posture since they are so variable depending on your config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, each RADIUS transaction will be depend on EAP type, protocol selection, key sizes, and timers.&amp;nbsp; Profiling will depend on probes enabled, and posture will depend on the checks performed, and more specifically the remediations configured.&amp;nbsp; For example, it may be trivial to update a registry setting, but much more bandwidth to fetch AV signatures, and even more to download a Windows service pack, especially if no local remediation server or WAN caching not employed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My general recommendation in these cases is to take what you believe to be a typical set of clients and then measure the load for that control set.&amp;nbsp; You can then extrapolate against the larger community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Often the bandwidth for RADIUS is not that high, but be sure to implement best practices for timers as called out in BRKSEC-3699 (find reference version of presentation @ ciscolive.com).&amp;nbsp; By setting reasonable timers for interim accounting, reauth, etc, you will limit the noise.&amp;nbsp; The session also calls out the need to set reasonable values for DHCP leases as there is an impact to profiling.&amp;nbsp; Related to Posture, consider the type of assessments and remediation needed and where the remediation servers are located.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Craig&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479879#M519563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig Hyps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-23T11:18:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Average ISE AAA+Posture bandwidth consumption per user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479880#M519564</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks Craig.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babacar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/average-ise-aaa-posture-bandwidth-consumption-per-user/m-p/3479880#M519564</guid>
      <dc:creator>bawagne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-23T12:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

