<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Device Administration for distributed ISE deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581114#M519829</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct and you should also make sure that your secondary admin is running same specs as the primary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-16T12:05:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Device Administration for distributed ISE deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581112#M519827</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is regarding a customer query and below is the customer network scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Administration Persona node, Monitoring node, PxGrid persona and PSN at Site 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MnT with Syslog server for redundancy and PSN node at Site 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Question pertains to if PAN at site 1 goes down, can a monitoring or PxGrid persona can take up Admin role as well? Or it is really recommended to have a secondary admin persona node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Any help on this would be appreciated! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Vaishnavi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581112#M519827</guid>
      <dc:creator>vaganesa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T04:11:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Administration for distributed ISE deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581113#M519828</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recommended to have secondary admin . In mine deployment i have 2 admin nodes . If something goes wrong i just promote secondary to primary .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581113#M519828</guid>
      <dc:creator>ognyan.totev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T06:44:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Administration for distributed ISE deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581114#M519829</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct and you should also make sure that your secondary admin is running same specs as the primary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/device-administration-for-distributed-ise-deployment/m-p/3581114#M519829</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason Kunst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T12:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

